# Stunt Driving Law Deemed Unconstitutional.

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stunt-driving-law-deemed-unconstitutional/127766
**Category:** SON240sx Automotive
**Created:** [September 4, 2009, 11:26am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stunt-driving-law-deemed-unconstitutional/127766 "2009-09-04T11:26:48Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 84

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ko-San](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Ko-San](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Ko-San)
#### Post date: [November 23, 2009, 3:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stunt-driving-law-deemed-unconstitutional/127766/84 "2009-11-23T15:44:25Z")

</div>

> [@name some high reving v6's](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/name-some-high-reving-v6s/24920/41):
>
> Lanes should be;
> 
> right - 100km/h - 120km/h  
> center - passing lane  
> left - 140km/h (at least) up to…160km/h?
> 
> something a long those lines.
> 
> Traffic would be cut immensely. MUCH less accidents.  
> I can not count how many close calls I have had from people cutting into the hammer lane right in front of me while I’m cruising at 130. Then they drive at 100km/h. Like…are you fucking kidding me!!!

agreed about the cruising and someone is driving 100… them following speed is actually more dangerous just because 120 is normal on highways

but i dont think theyll make middle lane passing lane because youd have people switching from both the 160 and the 100 lanes into the middle one which can get hectic

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stunt-driving-law-deemed-unconstitutional/127766)._