# Stunt Driving Law Deemed Unconstitutional. **URL:** \ **Category:** SON240sx Automotive\ **Created:** [September 4, 2009, 11:26am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stunt-driving-law-deemed-unconstitutional/127766 "2009-09-04T11:26:48Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 89
**Author:** ![Philly](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/philly/32/5748_2.png) [@Philly](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Philly)\ **Post date:** [November 23, 2009, 5:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stunt-driving-law-deemed-unconstitutional/127766/89 "2009-11-23T17:54:54Z")
> [@Official Skiing/Snowboarding Meet Thread Winter 06-07!!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-skiing-snowboarding-meet-thread-winter-06-07/21146/240): > > there should be classes of licensing other than G. > > after G you should be able to get technical driving certifications and car-specific certifications that support your ability to travel at faster speeds. > > the same way a nexus card deems you low-risk for crossing the border these certifications could give you another 20kph priviledge on 400 series highways. > > The laws have to reflect the general ability. For everyone of us that is a pretty talented driver there are a dozen or so people like one of my brothers and my sister who can’t drive for shit in an automatic car… i wont even drive with them they are so inexperienced behind the wheel… the law is for their benefit. > > this shit would also mean that more people get more training to drive and in general it would increase road safety… these certifications would lower insurance too so you wouldnt just get htem to drive faster and it doesnt necessarily mean you will drive faster anyways I agree we would have to have different coloured plates for the pigs to distinguish who is legally allowed to travel at a certain rate of speed. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stunt-driving-law-deemed-unconstitutional/127766)._