# Subaru 0 vs Mercury 1

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/subaru-0-vs-mercury-1/241489
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive
**Created:** [January 20, 2009, 7:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/subaru-0-vs-mercury-1/241489 "2009-01-20T19:40:13Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 41

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Celtic1982citleC](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/celtic1982citlec/32/6323_2.png) [@Celtic1982citleC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Celtic1982citleC)
#### Post date: [January 23, 2009, 1:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/subaru-0-vs-mercury-1/241489/41 "2009-01-23T13:32:09Z")

</div>

> [@This is a find](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-is-a-find/12942/10):
>
> Because the damage done looks almost identical. I guess your ability to read and comprehend the information in the sentence was compromised during your accident

You do realize the definition of ‘T-bone’ in reference to an accident means that Alan’s car was struck in the middle of the side of the car, hence the T reference? You said Alan got T-Boned, not Alan T-Boned someone…so if Alan was T-Boned then the damage to his WRX should be around the b-pillar and doors…not the front end? Hence your epil failure to properly state what you were trying to say.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/subaru-0-vs-mercury-1/241489)._
