# Subaru **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [December 17, 2006, 9:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/subaru/186885 "2006-12-17T21:36:05Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 33
**Author:** ![neonmike22](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ba8739/32.png) [@neonmike22](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/neonmike22)\ **Post date:** [December 22, 2006, 10:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/subaru/186885/33 "2006-12-22T22:36:25Z")
I’m not going to argue what’s better, but here’s some info: > [@WTFind: Core Charge](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wtfind-core-charge/26787/4): > > what advantage does your neon have over a stock srt-4 power to weight ratio wise? arent they roughly the same weight? It’s not even close. A 1st gen coupe like his is about 2500lbs or so. The SRT-4 is 2900+. It’s about like the difference between a GC and a GD (comparing an early impreza to a new one for the non subaru types reading this). > [@WTFind: Core Charge](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wtfind-core-charge/26787/4): > > spending a lot of money just to get your neon to the level of a stock srt-4. It wouldn’t be that terribly expensive to get an early neon like that to the level of a stock SRT. Most of the SRT-4 engine parts are really cheap. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/subaru/186885)._