# Supra vs Lamborghini Murcielago **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [February 26, 2008, 1:50pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/supra-vs-lamborghini-murcielago/195755 "2008-02-26T13:50:57Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 32
**Author:** ![xlogic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/59ef9b/32.png) [@xlogic](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/xlogic)\ **Post date:** [February 27, 2008, 11:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/supra-vs-lamborghini-murcielago/195755/32 "2008-02-27T11:19:59Z")
> [@Autodesk Architectural Desktop 06 serial #](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/autodesk-architectural-desktop-06-serial/35145/2): > > you just do not understand. > > The car is meant to be pretty fast, but that’s a small part of what a lambo/ferrari/aston martin/etc… is all about. Fit and finish, low production numbers, prestige of owning one are all more important than outright speed. > > If you roll up in a lambo, it doesn’t matter if the econobox civic or even a supra is faster. It’s a completely different world. oh but i do understand…he took his lambo to the track…which means he wanted to show it off in one way or another…just for a truck that probably is 3 times it’s weight to be running almost 2 seconds faster. and 9 times out of 10…when someone has a car like that they usually have “douchebag” programmed into their brain --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/supra-vs-lamborghini-murcielago/195755)._