# Sweetest '69 Camaro you'll ever see!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [May 31, 2010, 4:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836 "2010-05-31T16:41:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)
#### Post date: [June 1, 2010, 11:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/21 "2010-06-01T11:05:05Z")

</div>

1. This car is a 67
2. I haven’t studied the build quality

With that said, I prefer the 67 with the 2JZ swap

[http://www.streetfire.net/album/1967-chevrolet-camaro-ss-2jz-supra-sport-by-evs\_1452188.htm](http://www.streetfire.net/album/1967-chevrolet-camaro-ss-2jz-supra-sport-by-evs_1452188.htm)

now THAT is an interior

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TrueBlue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/trueblue/32/7245_2.png) [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)
#### Post date: [June 1, 2010, 11:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/22 "2010-06-01T11:31:52Z")

</div>

> [@boardjnky4](#):
>
> 1. This car is a 67

Stick to late models.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)
#### Post date: [June 1, 2010, 11:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/23 "2010-06-01T11:35:08Z")

</div>

> [@TrueBlue](#):
>
> Stick to late models.

I meant the car that I linked to, not the OP

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![camarojoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c67d28/32.png) [@camarojoe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/camarojoe)
#### Post date: [June 1, 2010, 12:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/24 "2010-06-01T12:03:43Z")

</div>

> [@boardjnky4](#):
>
> 1. This car is a 67
> 2. I haven’t studied the build quality
> 
> With that said, I prefer the 67 with the 2JZ swap
> 
> [http://www.streetfire.net/album/1967-chevrolet-camaro-ss-2jz-supra-sport-by-evs\_1452188.htm](http://www.streetfire.net/album/1967-chevrolet-camaro-ss-2jz-supra-sport-by-evs_1452188.htm)
> 
> now THAT is an interior

Wrong answer. It’s a 69.  
Edit: NM, I see what you did

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![steve2k1116](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/steve2k1116/32/5230_2.png) [@steve2k1116](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/steve2k1116)
#### Post date: [June 1, 2010, 12:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/25 "2010-06-01T12:12:41Z")

</div>

sweetest… definitely not but it is cool and has some serious craftsmanship going on

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Willybeen](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/willybeen/32/7351_2.png) [@Willybeen](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Willybeen)
#### Post date: [June 1, 2010, 1:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/26 "2010-06-01T13:04:35Z")

</div>

96vbird wins this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Paulo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/paulo/32/7328_2.png) [@Paulo](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Paulo)
#### Post date: [June 1, 2010, 1:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/27 "2010-06-01T13:24:31Z")

</div>

> [@boardjnky4](#):
>
> 1. This car is a 67
> 2. I haven’t studied the build quality
> 
> With that said, I prefer the 67 with the 2JZ swap
> 
> [http://www.streetfire.net/album/1967-chevrolet-camaro-ss-2jz-supra-sport-by-evs\_1452188.htm](http://www.streetfire.net/album/1967-chevrolet-camaro-ss-2jz-supra-sport-by-evs_1452188.htm)
> 
> now THAT is an interior

Yessir. :tup: That car is just a whole lot of win. LOVE the interior.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![The\_Russian](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/the_russian/32/7414_2.png) [@The\_Russian](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/The_Russian)
#### Post date: [June 4, 2010, 5:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/28 "2010-06-04T05:40:51Z")

</div>

Hate the wheels/steering wheel.

And to think, if your going to spend that much, you think you would put better speakers in than Alpine Type-R’s…really

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![91MR2](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/91mr2/32/7217_2.png) [@91MR2](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/91MR2)
#### Post date: [June 4, 2010, 6:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/29 "2010-06-04T06:22:12Z")

</div>

The car in the OP fucking sucks. Sure it’s “clean” but it looks awful. No taste at all. That 2JZ Supra, now THAT was done right…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jam](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jam/32/7235_2.png) [@Jam](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jam)
#### Post date: [June 4, 2010, 7:15am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836/30 "2010-06-04T07:15:44Z")

</div>

Those wheels are the ugliest things I have ever seen

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sweetest-69-camaro-youll-ever-see/155836.md?page=1)