# Synapse Camaro SS Devolepment

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/synapse-camaro-ss-devolepment/265944>\
**Category:** Builds\
**Created:** [January 7, 2013, 8:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/synapse-camaro-ss-devolepment/265944 "2013-01-07T08:24:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 50

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2013, 8:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/synapse-camaro-ss-devolepment/265944/50 "2013-01-27T20:26:39Z")

</div>

> [@Phone #](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/phone/51583/12):
>
> Results were rather good. The stock Airbox isn’t much of a restriction until the upper end of the power band. Our custom camshaft is in the works, along with some trick modified rocker arms to handle increased spring pressures. We will be posting installation Pics along with results as we head down this road…
> 
> ![http://i1308.photobucket.com/albums/s615/SteveatSynapse/SSboxvsIntake_zps76788411.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/e/8/e899b0f77b871b0b0d220191518bb3b3d7bdd011.jpeg)

why new rocker arms? the stockers are more then efficient enough to handle a .660 lift. I have actually seen more aluminum aftermarket rocker arms break over stockers. Its the stockers bearings that are the weakness but that can be fixed by the “trunion bearing” upgrade.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/synapse-camaro-ss-devolepment/265944)._