# Taurus SHO

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/taurus-sho/188515>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [March 11, 2007, 8:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/taurus-sho/188515 "2007-03-11T08:01:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 9:02am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/taurus-sho/188515/17 "2007-03-12T09:02:09Z")

</div>

> [@Speak up against Telban!!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/speak-up-against-telban/28675/2):
>
> its good enough for a DD. i wont be racing it or anything.

if you’re using it as a DD…

i would get get the earler V6 over a newer V8  
and if you’re considering contour SVT  
id go in this order

99-2000 SVT contour, early V6 SHO, 98 SVT contour, V8 SHO

onyl reason i’m giving the contour the edge is cause its newer. & personally i prefer a lot better handling car over a one that is slightly quicker in a straight line

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/taurus-sho/188515)._