# Tesla Model S: 0-60 in 2.5s, 762HP (Now w/ Fart Mode)

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [March 26, 2009, 3:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160 "2009-03-26T15:39:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2012, 10:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/81 "2012-06-21T10:18:58Z")

</div>

Anyone notice the guy putting gas in the car at the end was drive a Volt?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigRon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/58956e/32.png) [@BigRon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigRon)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2012, 11:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/82 "2012-06-21T11:47:05Z")

</div>

> [@ZOMGVTEK](#):
>
> It’s honestly a good vehicle irrespective of its power plant. The price isn’t unreasonable. It’s not an ecobox like the Leaf or Volt. It’s something a lot of people would actually like to drive.

It wil be interesting to see how this compares to the Cadillac “Volt”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![newman](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/newman/32/7569_2.png) [@newman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/newman)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2012, 1:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/83 "2012-06-21T13:18:55Z")

</div>

That’s a good commercial.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jam](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jam/32/7235_2.png) [@Jam](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jam)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 6:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/84 "2012-06-22T06:44:46Z")

</div>

> [@JayS](#):
>
> Who will have the last laugh when the grid fails this afternoon? Already ordering one of these:
> 
> [http://www.tailgatorzone.com/](http://www.tailgatorzone.com/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rugsr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rugsr/32/7474_2.png) [@rugsr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rugsr)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 12:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/85 "2012-06-22T12:00:28Z")

</div>

Whats going on this afternoon?  
EMP I heard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigRon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/58956e/32.png) [@BigRon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigRon)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2012, 7:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/86 "2012-10-09T19:55:47Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Onyx\_Z32](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/onyx_z32/32/7581_2.png) [@Onyx\_Z32](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Onyx_Z32)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/87 "2012-10-11T06:20:29Z")

</div>

Electric motor torque :tup:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/88 "2012-10-11T06:23:28Z")

</div>

that’s awesome…now I’ve just got to come up with $70k lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/89 "2012-10-11T06:44:47Z")

</div>

I have my doubts about the M5 vs Tesla race vid considering Motor Trend tested both and the M5 was faster in 0-60 and 1/4 mile.

Tesla: 0-60 time: 3.9 seconds. Quarter mile: 12.5 seconds at 110.9 mph  
M5: 0-60 time: 3.7 seconds. Quarter mile: 11.9 seconds at 120.3 mph

> **[Motor Trend tests Tesla Model S, finds 0-60 in 3.9 sec and 100.7 MPGe](https://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/27/motor-trend-tests-tesla-model-s-finds-0-60-in-3-9-sec-an/)**
>
> Tesla has said the highest-end Model S has a range of 300 miles (at 55 miles per hour), but until recently, it's been tremendously difficult for anyone outside the company to verify this number. When the EPA did its testing thing, it came up with a...

  

> **[2013 BMW M5 First Test - Motor Trend](http://www.motortrend.com/cars/bmw/m5/2013/2013-bmw-m5-test/)**
>
> The 2013 BMW M5 manages to address the daily driving issues ignored by the e60, while simultaneously blowing it out of the water in performance. Read on to learn more about the 2013 BMW M5 in this first test brought to you by the automotive experts...

Still both seriously quick cars. Close enough that a better driver in the Tesla could definitely make the difference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Onyx\_Z32](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/onyx_z32/32/7581_2.png) [@Onyx\_Z32](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Onyx_Z32)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/90 "2012-10-11T06:47:35Z")

</div>

In that video the M5 looses traction and gets a little sideways, I’m sure it could make up more time. But the overall point is to show how fast this car is in relation to something considered sort of a bench mark.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/91 "2012-10-11T06:49:25Z")

</div>

With the M5, they may have done the different tests in the “auto”/manual versions. Regardless, close enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigRon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/58956e/32.png) [@BigRon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigRon)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/92 "2012-10-11T06:55:16Z")

</div>

> [@Onyx Z32](#):
>
> In that video the M5 looses traction and gets a little sideways, I’m sure it could make up more time. But the overall point is to show how fast this car is in relation to something considered sort of a bench mark.

My comment to the person who sent me the note, “I have seen better launches out of the jamaican space program.”

I wonder if they were using launch control and if it was a auto or manual. From the other article I was reading the 6MT is tough to launch.

[![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/1/0/107d121021a2b3055861027aa826bd45c69d8a0c.jpeg "BMW M5: Launch Control VS Smoky Burnout") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uydwMsZ5tp4)

Either way very impressive considering they were originally shooting for 5.5 0-60.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Onyx\_Z32](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/onyx_z32/32/7581_2.png) [@Onyx\_Z32](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Onyx_Z32)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:57am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/93 "2012-10-11T06:57:50Z")

</div>

Has anyone here launched an electric car before? All that torque instantly at 0 RPM is probably hard to manage too, unless there is some other electric traction control wizardry working at the same time. It’s pobably is quite the kick-in-the-pants in this car.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigRon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/58956e/32.png) [@BigRon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigRon)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 7:09am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/94 "2012-10-11T07:09:42Z")

</div>

> [@Onyx Z32](#):
>
> Has anyone here launched an electric car before? All that torque instantly at 0 RPM is probably hard to manage too, unless there is some other electric traction control wizardry working at the same time. It’s pobably is quite the kick-in-the-pants in this car.

I have launched a hybrid and it pulls instantly. They do tune them so they don’t just melt tires.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 8:11am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/95 "2012-10-11T08:11:27Z")

</div>

yeah the output would have to be regulated for sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bing](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bing/32/7211_2.png) [@bing](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bing)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 3:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/96 "2012-10-11T15:15:17Z")

</div>

the Tesla S looks like a Korean car… so ghey

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/2X/b/b7170c8eddc0b95ece6b88172b2f416a08489a45.png) [@system](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/system)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 3:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/97 "2012-10-11T15:32:59Z")

</div>

> [@bing](#):
>
> the Tesla S looks like a Korean car… so ghey

Thank you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigRon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/58956e/32.png) [@BigRon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigRon)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2012, 8:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/98 "2012-10-16T08:40:06Z")

</div>

> It appears that Tesla’s new $600-per-year service program for its Model S is not going over well with some of the owners and wait-listers. David Noland, a Model S reservation holder and freelance writer, has dug into it the details and clarified the one he’s finding most annoying. And as it turns out, he’s not the only one taking issue with the program.
> 
> According to Green Car Reports, Noland owns a 2011 Chevrolet Volt and likes the service coverage for the plug-in hybrid’s electric motor and battery thermal-management system. It only needs minimal maintenance – a $49 annual system check at a local dealer and a $35 oil change every two years. That’s $84 for two years of routine maintenance. For the Model S, it’s a lot higher: $600 per year, and that electric car doesn’t even need the oil change.
> 
> Further investigation showed that the matter is even more serious. In a recent blog post on Tesla Motor Club forum, Tesla’s vice president, George Blankenship, made the policy more clear in comments on a post about the new service plans: failure to pay $600 for an annual inspection voids the warranty. Plus, any visit to a non-Tesla shop for any type of service will void the warranty, a provision that could run afoul of the law.

[http://green.autoblog.com/2012/10/15/tesla-model-s-requires-600-annual-service-plan-to-keep-warranty/](http://green.autoblog.com/2012/10/15/tesla-model-s-requires-600-annual-service-plan-to-keep-warranty/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![focusinprogress](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/focusinprogress/32/7227_2.png) [@focusinprogress](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/focusinprogress)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2012, 9:27am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/99 "2012-10-16T09:27:50Z")

</div>

^ I came in here to post that lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![travisn](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/travisn/32/5046_2.png) [@travisn](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/travisn)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2012, 10:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160/100 "2012-10-16T10:06:54Z")

</div>

so some hick mechanic works on a totally electric vehicle and does something wonky, a year later the car blows up and Tesla is supposed to cover it?

I’m sure it’s not totally inclusive like tire changes or wiper blades, but there is a lot of engineering and process that goes into these cars so I understand to a point

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tesla-model-s-0-60-in-2-5s-762hp-now-w-fart-mode/65160.md?page=6)
