# /TESTING WATERS- 2000/2001 MUSTANG GT SHELLS

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753>\
**Category:** Classifieds\
**Created:** [October 12, 2009, 6:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753 "2009-10-12T18:41:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ericvw7989](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ericvw7989/32/5070_2.png) [@ericvw7989](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ericvw7989)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 9:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/21 "2009-10-13T09:45:30Z")

</div>

You drive this thing around west seneca like an idiot. I remember seeing you around center/union constantly beating the shit out of it and very stupid driving choice. glws though

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ericvw7989](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ericvw7989/32/5070_2.png) [@ericvw7989](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ericvw7989)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 9:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/22 "2009-10-13T09:46:18Z")

</div>

> [@itsgoindown513](#):
>
> i actually met the dude who owned it before you a few times. car did look really nice before you got ahold of it. i see this thing a few times a week. the body is BEAT.

You have no room to talk.stfu.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![95dime](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/95dime/32/7514_2.png) [@95dime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/95dime)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 9:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/23 "2009-10-13T09:48:09Z")

</div>

this car has had a rough life but there is alot thats been put into it. looks like theres even more that goes with it now too. would be a good project for someone to actually fix it and clean it up. hope it goes to someone that actually fixes it instead of beat on it and throw it up forsale again. glws.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 11:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/24 "2009-10-13T11:34:13Z")

</div>

> [@95dime](#):
>
> this car has had a rough life but there is alot thats been put into it. looks like theres even more that goes with it now too. would be a good project for someone to actually fix it and clean it up. hope it goes to someone that actually fixes it instead of beat on it and throw it up forsale again. glws.

Yeah thats wht i was doing. Then some lady hit me so tht pissed me off cause i dont want fiberglass in the quater panel. Now this older 70 mustang came along its a deal i cant pass up if this car sells.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![itsgoindown513](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/94ad74/32.png) [@itsgoindown513](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/itsgoindown513)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 1:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/25 "2009-10-13T13:37:20Z")

</div>

> [@ericvw7989](#):
>
> You have no room to talk.stfu.

like you do?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freek](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/freek/32/7357_2.png) [@Freek](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Freek)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 3:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/26 "2009-10-13T15:12:40Z")

</div>

Try and stay on topic everyone.  
Commenting about the history of the car is relevant. Going after other members isn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 8:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/27 "2009-10-21T08:51:42Z")

</div>

bump

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FiftyCheven](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fiftycheven/32/4950_2.png) [@FiftyCheven](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/FiftyCheven)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 9:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/28 "2009-10-21T09:34:59Z")

</div>

> [@SpeedRacer89](#):
>
> It has had a rough life till i got it I have been putting back together since then.
> 
> I have never got a official number but the GT motor is rated at 260 I heard it was like 20-30 more hp difference.
> 
> Also the difference between these motors are the police interceptor has different internals and a hotter cam.
> 
> The GT motor is a 4.6 windsor.  
> The police interceptor is a 4.6 romeo.  
> All this means is these motors were made at different plants. which means the heads are different and the cranks are different. The are both PI jus the way the valve cover goes on is different. The romeo has a 6 bolt cast crank and the gt has jus a 8 bolt crank.

This is completely false. There was certainly no 20-30hp differences. The internals were not different between police interceptors and standard 4.6L’s. The camS were not different. The only differences were the intake, throttle body and ECUs. You are correct on the crank and heads being different for romeo’s…stock for stock, a windsor is far better…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 1:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/29 "2009-10-21T13:01:30Z")

</div>

> [@FiftyCheven](#):
>
> This is completely false. There was certainly no 20-30hp differences. The internals were not different between police interceptors and standard 4.6L’s. The camS were not different. The only differences were the intake, throttle body and ECUs. You are correct on the crank and heads being different for romeo’s…stock for stock, a windsor is far better…

the cams are deff different i checked that myself and far as everthing i am going by wht other people said. Lots of people say the internals are different but i have no proof.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LUKE\_L](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/luke_l/32/7462_2.png) [@LUKE\_L](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LUKE_L)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 1:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/30 "2009-10-21T13:07:53Z")

</div>

Do you have a pic of the parts car? Is the parts car driveable/rolling chassis?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 5:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/31 "2009-10-21T17:14:40Z")

</div>

no it does not move the rearend is gone but it can be moved

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 5:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/32 "2009-10-21T17:15:58Z")

</div>

more pics parts car

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 5:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/33 "2009-10-21T17:16:43Z")

</div>

more pics

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jack](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jack/32/7613_2.png) [@Jack](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jack)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 5:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/34 "2009-10-21T17:32:20Z")

</div>

Looks like the front end is removed… and the rearend has brakes and tires still on it. Right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 6:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/35 "2009-10-21T18:22:26Z")

</div>

no i dont have the rearend the guy i bought the car off of was goin to trade me that rearend for my irs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2009, 10:10pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/36 "2009-10-29T22:10:49Z")

</div>

bump

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2009, 8:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/37 "2009-11-03T20:03:55Z")

</div>

BUMP

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/2X/b/b7170c8eddc0b95ece6b88172b2f416a08489a45.png) [@system](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/system)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2009, 9:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/38 "2009-11-03T21:37:47Z")

</div>

The damage isn’t that bad in the pics from where you say you were hit. Can you take a few more pictures of it, maybe I’m just blind or the rolled fender is throwing me off.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 9:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/39 "2009-11-04T09:31:02Z")

</div>

yeah i have more pics i will upload them when i get home. Its not that bad i would fix but i jus found a older mustang i wanna buy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedRacer89](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/speedracer89/32/4989_2.png) [@SpeedRacer89](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SpeedRacer89)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 5:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753/40 "2009-11-04T17:14:51Z")

</div>

MORE DAMAGE PICS

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/testing-waters-2000-2001-mustang-gt-shells/74753.md?page=3)
