# The 5.0 is back ! Eat shit camaro/mopar owners **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [May 23, 2010, 10:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023 "2010-05-23T10:22:19Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 1:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/21 "2010-05-23T13:55:20Z")
why are yins camaro and mopar guys getting butt hurt? Yins should of seen this long time ago. Ford always wins with sells 🤣 Sells don’t mean bigger HP and Performance. It means over all buyers. teens to grandmas. mustangs wins 🤣 ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/22 "2010-05-23T14:01:40Z")
Once again bullshit > [@People With Money In the Market](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/people-with-money-in-the-market/42103/57): > > ok same weight around 3600 lbs. Takes bolts ons and nitrous to run tens. Cobra does it with bolt ons and pulleys. Pretty much the same just one is 8 years older. ---
**Author:** ![BigMack\_Srt8](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bigmack_srt8/32/6025_2.png) [@BigMack\_Srt8](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigMack_Srt8)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/23 "2010-05-23T14:02:06Z")
Not getting butt hurt. Mustang sells are always more because they have a convertable and we all know girls love them some verts. Saying a car is better because it puts out pretty much exactly what cars of its class put out is dumb. They are all nice cars and all have there ups and downs. And no point in even trying to argue with quik because even the makers of the car will lose in a battle. ---
**Author:** ![Orr89rocz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac91a4/32.png) [@Orr89rocz](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Orr89rocz)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/24 "2010-05-23T14:05:46Z")
QUik your joking right?? [http://www.streetlegaltv.com/forum/nitrous-assisted-2010-camaro-dips-into-3566.html#](http://www.streetlegaltv.com/forum/nitrous-assisted-2010-camaro-dips-into-3566.html#) bolt on motor with nitrous kit at over 3800 lbs, in the 10’s. Its not that hard buddy ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/25 "2010-05-23T14:07:39Z")
Sells are better not cause of a very cause better appearence and comfort. Its been this way since 1964 > [@The dangers of breakdancing](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-dangers-of-breakdancing/42296/8): > > Not getting butt hurt. Mustang sells are always more because they have a convertable and we all know girls love them some verts. Saying a car is better because it puts out pretty much exactly what cars of its class put out is dumb. They are all nice cars and all have there ups and downs. And no point in even trying to argue with quik because even the makers of the car will lose in a battle. ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/26 "2010-05-23T14:08:01Z")
Much as I love to argue with quik about anything, That’s a poor cop out excuse. The 2011 GT mustang has history in the backing. Anyone was a fool buying a 2010 camaro or srt hemi’s. Impulse purchases :rolleyes: ---
**Author:** ![BigMack\_Srt8](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bigmack_srt8/32/6025_2.png) [@BigMack\_Srt8](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigMack_Srt8)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/27 "2010-05-23T14:09:49Z")
i should i just bought an exploder. SHIT ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/28 "2010-05-23T14:12:01Z")
So it needs more cubes and weight reduction to run same times as new mustang? > [@craigslist goodness](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/craigslist-goodness/42289/10): > > QUik your joking right?? > > [http://www.streetlegaltv.com/forum/nitrous-assisted-2010-camaro-dips-into-3566.html#](http://www.streetlegaltv.com/forum/nitrous-assisted-2010-camaro-dips-into-3566.html#) > > bolt on motor with nitrous kit at over 3800 lbs, in the 10’s. Its not that hard buddy ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/29 "2010-05-23T14:12:46Z")
Should of. That is why beaters are made. ---
**Author:** ![Spyderking69](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Spyderking69](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Spyderking69)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/30 "2010-05-23T14:13:34Z")
So what is this… the first time an inhouse stock Mustang has out performed the Camaro, Charger, Challenger guys… hmmm took ya long enough ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/31 "2010-05-23T14:16:08Z")
Try again the 5liter cars destroyed the turd gems and the early lt1. Cars > [@Are you kidding? GM insanity inside.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/are-you-kidding-gm-insanity-inside/42024/81): > > So what is this… the first time an inhouse stock Mustang has out performed the Camaro, Charger, Challenger guys… hmmm took ya long enough ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/32 "2010-05-23T14:19:34Z")
Lt1’s put the 5.0 to pasture. But as years went on the Lt1 was indeed a fucking headache, so really Lt1 is a bastard years 🤣 Old school 5.0 +1 ---
**Author:** ![gillbot](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/gillbot/32/6029_2.png) [@gillbot](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/gillbot)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/33 "2010-05-23T14:21:57Z")
> [@CANADIAN TICKET???](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/canadian-ticket/42281/34): > > bullshit, find a unopend motor LS3 or L99 camaro running 10s on spray LS1tech has plenty of examples ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/34 "2010-05-23T14:23:11Z")
Who cares. The 5.0 is back and for many more years to come Only took GM 8 years to figure out the camaro and put it in a movie to move sells.\ Consistency, Something GM never had ---
**Author:** ![Orr89rocz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac91a4/32.png) [@Orr89rocz](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Orr89rocz)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/35 "2010-05-23T14:27:58Z")
> [@Quik"](#): > > So it needs more cubes and weight reduction to run same times as new mustang? If the camaro was the same weight as the mustang, it would outperform it. It makes more power than the mustang on the same shot size. You know that weight slows it down. What are you arguing here? Mustang is lighter than the camaro by a good 100-150 lbs. I cant find the information on that 10.88 mustang to know how light it is with its drag wheels but assuming all thats done to it is just wheels like the camaro, then the camaro is still a good 100 lbs lighter, probably closer to 150 on car weight alone. WE dont know the driver weight. WE dont know the weather conditions at the tracks. There could be a good tenth difference elsewhere. Dont know the shot size that camaro is running either. But the point is both can be into the 10’s with bolt ons and spray. Being heavier is gonna require more power which is cubes or more spray. ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/36 "2010-05-23T14:29:48Z")
Forgot to add, The mustang is bread and winner The ford gt was funded on mustangs sells. Gm had to sell cobalts and other junk to fund corvettes mopar had to sell sebrings and other junk to fund the viper. yet the viper program lost $ each year. ---
**Author:** ![BigMack\_Srt8](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bigmack_srt8/32/6025_2.png) [@BigMack\_Srt8](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigMack_Srt8)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/37 "2010-05-23T14:32:02Z")
shaggy. Mustang was in transformers also. ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/38 "2010-05-23T14:36:17Z")
> [@Are you kidding? GM insanity inside.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/are-you-kidding-gm-insanity-inside/42024/82): > > If the camaro was the same weight as the mustang, it would outperform it. It makes more power than the mustang on the same shot size. You know that weight slows it down. What are you arguing here? Mustang is lighter than the camaro by a good 100-150 lbs. I cant find the information on that 10.88 mustang to know how light it is with its drag wheels but assuming all thats done to it is just wheels like the camaro, then the camaro is still a good 100 lbs lighter, probably closer to 150 on car weight alone. > > WE dont know the driver weight. WE dont know the weather conditions at the tracks. There could be a good tenth difference elsewhere. Dont know the shot size that camaro is running either. But the point is both can be into the 10’s with bolt ons and spray. Being heavier is gonna require more power which is cubes or more spray. Fuck this weight argument. The 5.0 liter is back. It helps competition for yins die hard GM / Mopar folks ---
**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 2:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/39 "2010-05-23T14:39:05Z")
Awesome thread. I don’t care anyway about either of the cars mentioned. 5.0 Fox \>\* ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2010, 4:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023/40 "2010-05-23T16:02:11Z")
I know what tech has reason I said show proof > [@On another topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/7056/11): > > LS1tech has plenty of examples [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023.md?page=1) [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-5-0-is-back-eat-shit-camaro-mopar-owners/205023.md?page=3)