# The auto's role in Global warming

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-autos-role-in-global-warming/44933>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [March 13, 2008, 6:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-autos-role-in-global-warming/44933 "2008-03-13T06:46:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nikuk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/nikuk/32/7254_2.png) [@Nikuk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Nikuk)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2008, 9:08am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-autos-role-in-global-warming/44933/6 "2008-03-13T09:08:06Z")

</div>

> [@Fry](#):
>
> Granted, as long as they’re not just turning a blind eye to power generation.

Where do you see an effort towards the largest “polluters” happening?

We won’t agree to kyoto, and I don’t see any american plan to replace / compete with it.

6% is good…

Imagine if the money & marketing was aimed at the largest sectors.

6% of 100 = 6.  
6% of 5000 = 300.

Sure it would cost more, (and bring more 3rd parties into the R&D process, creating more jobs / business / competition / premiums, but who cares about that right?), so lets say for the same price you can only reduce it by 1%…

Make believe numbers:  
$10 million = 6% of 100, which is 6 tons  
$10 million = 1% of 5000, which is 50 tons.

See what I’m saying?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-autos-role-in-global-warming/44933)._