# the canon rebel xsi w/ 18-55 mm lens

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-canon-rebel-xsi-w-18-55-mm-lens/200812>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [November 24, 2008, 11:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-canon-rebel-xsi-w-18-55-mm-lens/200812 "2008-11-24T11:47:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 37

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BooSSted\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/5f9b8f/32.png) [@BooSSted\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BooSSted_SS)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2008, 7:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-canon-rebel-xsi-w-18-55-mm-lens/200812/37 "2008-11-29T07:01:43Z")

</div>

I have a D60 and Really like it!!!

> [@Jumped head first into the deep end at the JDM kiddie pool.....](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jumped-head-first-into-the-deep-end-at-the-jdm-kiddie-pool/38822/46):
>
> I’ve shot with a 30d at 3200iso and it was alot cleaner than my XT with iso at 1600.
> 
> Its a little hard to find a picture of people using the XSi at iso1600, but I found one. Its a perfect example of how iso1600 on these cameras, unless really pressed for the shot, really isn’t wanted.
> 
> ![http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_1000D_Rebel_XS/images/results/Can450Dvs1000D_1600iso.jpg](http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_1000D_Rebel_XS/images/results/Can450Dvs1000D_1600iso.jpg)
> 
> You can run the pictures thru noise ninja to get rid of some of the noise but this might not be what some people want.
> 
> Here goes a picture shot with the canon XS at iso1600. Again these pictures are nothing how yours looks.
> 
> ![http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_1000D_Rebel_XS/images/results/Can1000D_1600iso_NRoff.jpg](http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_1000D_Rebel_XS/images/results/Can1000D_1600iso_NRoff.jpg)
> 
> Here is the link for the website I got the pictures from.  
> [click me](http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_1000D_Rebel_XS/images/results/Can450Dvs1000D_200iso.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_1000D_Rebel_XS/noise.shtml&usg=__TpyzfT6GNzsMgDHcfUfWBvW-DD8=&h=241&w=241&sz=12&hl=en&start=49&um=1&tbnid=lbezPemG9gE4DM:&tbnh=110&tbnw=110&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcanon%2Bxsi%2Bhigh%2Biso%26start%3D36%26ndsp%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN)
> 
> The end of your post I will agree with.

> [@To teach a man to fish...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/to-teach-a-man-to-fish/38781/53):
>
> That is like a 200% crop  
> the whole image looks fine to me. NO ONE looks at pics at that blown up size so that is a worthless crop that person did. Most people blow up to 8x10 and you will never see the noise in that size print…plus they picked the most underexposed part of the image that give more noise. as a whole that image looks fine

You’re an idiot!! Look to the left of the flowers in the unzoomed picture. do you see where it’s all pixelated and discolored? That’s noise. it’s not very desirable! High ISO’s cause that in digital photography…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-canon-rebel-xsi-w-18-55-mm-lens/200812)._