> [@bing](#):
>
> i agree with Paulo.
>
> no one was protesting anything of importance other than the fact that our Gov spent $1B and blocked off a major section of the busiest city in Canada for several days for no good reason.
>
> that is why people are pissed off. When world leaders want to get together they can apparently strip you of your rights in the heart of the biggest city in the country and block you off just so that they can meet face to face?
>
> The whole thing was unnecessary.
>
> If it was done on the hush there would have been limited protesting or curisousity presence and it would not have cost $1B… if they did it up at a military base and allowed protesters to attend in certain areas there would have been no violence. They can truck in the caviar and hookers.
Oh come on Bing, they did it in Canada because they knew no one with any balls would be there. In Tiananmen Square a lone man stood down a freakin TANK. In your second video in Toronto protesters outnumbering police got chased out by men with plastic shields and wooden sticks. :lol:
---
> [@Onyx Z32](#):
>
> You can’t get bring together 20 of the worlds major economies on the hush. And the political imagery of them meeting on a military installation would be terrible.
The Bilderberg meetings are done on the hush and a lot of the same people are at those meetings. The G20 meeting is a political display to make people feel all warm and fuzzy.
---
> [@JayS](#):
>
> Oh come on Bing, they did it in Canada because they knew no one with any balls would be there. In Tiananmen Square a lone man stood down a freakin TANK. In your second video in Toronto protesters outnumbering police got chased out by men with plastic shields and wooden sticks. :lol:
Pittsburgh was no better. Hippies running up to cops in riot gear trying to hug them… HUG THEM, lol.
> [@Blue Eyed Devil](#):
>
> The Bilderberg meetings are done on the hush…
Then how do you know these meetings are actually happening? :snky:
---
> [@Onyx Z32](#):
>
> You can’t get bring together 20 of the worlds major economies on the hush. And the political imagery of them meeting on a military installation would be terrible.
so shutting down the core of Toronto for 3 days with a fucking fence and then paying people (police) to ID and search anyone suspicious either trying to enter or in the vacinity of the fence is not ‘terrible’?
they had to enact a new law to grant police these rights (strip them from the public) for pretty much no cause and blew a billion dollars in the process.
yeah, much better optics here.
---
> [@bing](#):
>
> so shutting down the core of Toronto for 3 days with a fucking fence and then paying people (police) to ID and search anyone suspicious either trying to enter or in the vacinity of the fence is not ‘terrible’?
>
> they had to enact a new law to grant police these rights (strip them from the public) for pretty much no cause and blew a billion dollars in the process.
>
> yeah, much better optics here.
You’re just mad the Japan delegation didn’t bring over a bunch of JDM stuff as party favors for residents of the area 😛
---
> [@bing](#):
>
> … yeah, much better optics here.
Absolutely these are better optics. A military installation implies war and conflict. Doing it in Toronto, and semi-annually in each member country implies cooperation.
---
> [@JayS](#):
>
> Imagine the talk from people like Blue Eyes and Carnut if you ever did that though. All the major government powers meeting at some clandestine military facility. The conspiracy people wouldn’t come out of their bunkers and panic rooms for a month. Wait… maybe that would be a good thing.
You can call it what you want. However, I don’t believe in anything. Conspiracy or not. I just don’t blindly accept what others tell me. When you are only given one side of a story how are you ever able to make an informed decision?
Same goes for religion or god. You _seem_ like a fairly intelligent person. What do you make of that? Do you blindly and faithfully believe that there is someone watching you? There has been no proof, I guess you must be a conspiracy theorist!!! Oh wait, there is a mass of people who believe in a god. Then it must be ok as long as the mass of people believe.
Your arguments are always illogical because in order to be logical you must take all factors, given and variables, into account to solve the equation.
I see no harm in free thinking. I’m sorry you can’t see the upside of it.
---
> [@Carnut](#):
>
> You can call it what you want. However, I don’t believe in anything. Conspiracy or not. I just don’t blindly accept what others tell me. When you are only given one side of a story how are you ever able to make an informed decision?
>
> Same goes for religion or god. You _seem_ like a fairly intelligent person. What do you make of that? Do you blindly and faithfully believe that there is someone watching you? There has been no proof, I guess you must be a conspiracy theorist!!! Oh wait, there is a mass of people who believe in a god. Then it must be ok as long as the mass of people believe.
>
> Your arguments are always illogical because in order to be logical you must take all factors, given and variables, into account to solve the equation.
>
> I see no harm in free thinking. I’m sorry you can’t see the upside of it.
My problem is how you weigh the value of your sources. You’ll take an obscure paper written as an exercise in legal thinking and then imply it carries more weight than a hundred years of case law. You pick and choose your data to support your fringe ideas.
Locking on to tiny fragments of evidence that support your position while ignoring the mountains that go against you is not free thinking; it’s ignorance.
---
> [@JayS](#):
>
> My problem is how you weigh the value of your sources. You’ll take an obscure paper written as an exercise in legal thinking and then imply it carries more weight than a hundred years of case law. You pick and choose your data to support your fringe ideas.
>
> Locking on to tiny fragments of evidence that support your position while ignoring the mountains that go against you is not free thinking; it’s ignorance.
You see it as locking in on fringe arguments, it’s merely more sides to the story. Call it what you like. It’s ok. However blatantly ignoring all information makes you guilty of the same accusation. Does it not? That is the definition of ignorance.
Small discoveries have overturned years of static thinking in the past have they not. You know, like the world is flat, we are the center of our solar system.
Burn me at the stake.
Aside, how do you consider Lysander Spooner to be obscure?
---
that was a weak protest
everyone is too afraid of loosing there entertained lifes.
Young street should have been burned to the ground to make a fucking point that we dont want american world leaders and/or the global elite anywhere near canada.
Fuck the european union
fuck the new world order
fuck the united dollar
---