# The new fuel economy standards congress passed

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-new-fuel-economy-standards-congress-passed/40451>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [December 18, 2007, 12:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-new-fuel-economy-standards-congress-passed/40451 "2007-12-18T12:02:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 76

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedrRocket](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redrrocket/32/7193_2.png) [@RedrRocket](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RedrRocket)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2007, 2:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-new-fuel-economy-standards-congress-passed/40451/76 "2007-12-19T14:51:21Z")

</div>

> [@JayS](#):
>
> :tdown: to adding more industry to the waterfront. This city will NEVER learn. Our kids will be looking at the waterfront and saying “why did they put windmills and ethanol plants there” the same way we look at it and say, “why did they put steel mills and highways there”.

steel mills and wind mills finantially are a good thing to have on the edge of a body of water. no one cared about asthetics during the industrial revolution.

steel & the materials required for it are hard to transport. water makes transportation easy.

it is unfortunate that things arent pretty as they could be by the water.

i dont see why they shouldnt build an ethanol plant in the Steel belt of buffalo. Jobs bring money in to make things prettier.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-new-fuel-economy-standards-congress-passed/40451)._