# this might be close to my new cam **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [November 19, 2006, 6:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305 "2006-11-19T06:17:17Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2006, 6:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305/1 "2006-11-19T06:17:17Z")
> [@Phil99vette](#): > > I guess there are secrets here. I thought the cam specs would stay with the cam but since kevin has given them duration out I’ll post the rest… > > 264/278 .654/.638 110 + 0 > > We’re using two different CC lobes on the intake and the exhaust, the springs are the new springs from texas speed to handle .700 lift and they are shimmed to .050 of coil bind. These springs are not on the market yet… thats for a 402 with L92s and a L76 intake which is very similar to me, i run a 408 with the same heads and intake the owner of that setup is shooting for 600rwhp!!! ---
**Author:** ![eurodad](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/eurodad/32/5988_2.png) [@eurodad](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/eurodad)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2006, 6:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305/2 "2006-11-19T06:35:29Z")
what cam would i need for the 6.0 with l92’s and the carbed intake? i was thinking someth in the 230’s duration would be plenty ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2006, 6:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305/3 "2006-11-19T06:38:23Z")
> [@hurricane katrina was bush's fault](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hurricane-katrina-was-bushs-fault/25858/71): > > what cam would i need for the 6.0 with l92’s and the carbed intake? i was thinking someth in the 230’s duration would be plenty from this new info somehting with a good bit of spilt favoring more Intake then anything so for an example 235/247 612/594 112 now that was an example but something along those lines i think sams one cam is similar to that, so it might just work ---
**Author:** ![eurodad](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/eurodad/32/5988_2.png) [@eurodad](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/eurodad)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2006, 7:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305/4 "2006-11-19T07:04:48Z")
> [@\*\*\*\*\*\* MARCH MADNESS 07 \*\*\*\*\*\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/march-madness-07/25660/47): > > from this new info somehting with a good bit of spilt favoring more Intake then anything > > so for an example > > 235/247 612/594 112 now that was an example but something along those lines > > i think sams one cam is similar to that, so it might just work if exhaust flow is not great, why more duration on exhaust and not more lift too. ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2006, 7:08am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305/5 "2006-11-19T07:08:01Z")
> [@OF COARSE! FYI.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/of-coarse-fyi/25925/12): > > if exhaust flow is not great, why more duration on exhaust and not more lift too. its not that its not great its just the intake flows that much more. and thats just from one built setup. that cam listed above wasnt suppose to be let out cause ie was done custom for the guy but somehow it got out and now its open to ppl to work from ---
**Author:** ![Orr89rocz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac91a4/32.png) [@Orr89rocz](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Orr89rocz)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2006, 10:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305/6 "2006-11-19T10:44:12Z")
thats a very large cam. 600whp doesnt seem too far out of reach with that cam. ---
**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2006, 11:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305/7 "2006-11-19T11:44:48Z")
> [@New Parts.....56k maybe.....](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-parts-56k-maybe/25880/33): > > thats a very large cam. 600whp doesnt seem too far out of reach with that cam. not when you consider the cubes and the air flow of the heads and intake over 330 CFM stock heads ---
**Author:** ![Orr89rocz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac91a4/32.png) [@Orr89rocz](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Orr89rocz)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2006, 11:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-might-be-close-to-my-new-cam/186305/8 "2006-11-19T11:55:48Z")
exactly…that will be a sick combination