# Thought the Nokia N95 was Baller w/ 5MP Camera?? **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [October 10, 2006, 10:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691 "2006-10-10T10:19:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![RuBiCaNT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rubicant/32/7622_2.png) [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2006, 10:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691/1 "2006-10-10T10:19:54Z")
[http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/](http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/) :jawdrop: ---
**Author:** ![MPD47](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mpd47/32/7383_2.png) [@MPD47](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MPD47)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2006, 10:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691/2 "2006-10-10T10:21:12Z")
I WANT IT. ---
**Author:** ![Bacon](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bacon/32/7230_2.png) [@Bacon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Bacon)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2006, 11:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691/3 "2006-10-10T11:53:25Z")
:O! ---
**Author:** ![DrDoS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ccd318/32.png) [@DrDoS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DrDoS)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2006, 11:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691/4 "2006-10-10T11:58:45Z")
lolololololol, dont think any network coudl support the bandwidth that it would need to take sending photos ---
**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2006, 12:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691/5 "2006-10-10T12:03:25Z")
ill still take the nokia, that one will actually be a good phone ---
**Author:** ![Geehee](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/geehee/32/7238_2.png) [@Geehee](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Geehee)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2006, 1:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691/6 "2006-10-10T13:09:18Z")
> [@Joe](#): > > ill still take the nokia, that one will actually be a good phone :word: wish it was cdma ---
**Author:** ![dmoffitt](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/dmoffitt/32/7455_2.png) [@dmoffitt](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/dmoffitt)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2006, 2:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691/7 "2006-10-10T14:53:03Z")
screw that, who cares if it’s 1.3MP or 10, that lens is a JOKE, you would never tell the difference - instead of a lower-res blurry shot you now get a bigger file with the same blurry shot full of chromatic aberrations and the like. that said, I like having a camera phone again (Pearl) ---
**Author:** ![Shockwave179](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shockwave179/32/7496_2.png) [@Shockwave179](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shockwave179)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2006, 5:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/thought-the-nokia-n95-was-baller-w-5mp-camera/18691/8 "2006-10-10T17:28:06Z")
I’d be deathly afraid to drop that, 1.) because it costs $950 :yikes: 2.) The camera might stop working or scratch the lense