# TT LS1 Skyline

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tt-ls1-skyline/191845
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [August 16, 2007, 6:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tt-ls1-skyline/191845 "2007-08-16T18:17:19Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![1320](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/1320/32/5949_2.png) [@1320](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/1320)
#### Post date: [August 19, 2007, 11:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tt-ls1-skyline/191845/14 "2007-08-19T11:54:44Z")

</div>

> [@FS: 81 Camaro Z/28 - Now with pics](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-81-camaro-z-28-now-with-pics/30570/37):
>
> I can kind of see the point in this context.
> 
> Turbo LS1 \> turbo 3.8L?
> 
> LS2TT 6.6L \> RB26 TT
> 
> In my opinion.

Maybe you are semi-correct. But the point I was making is that you already have a proven powerplant in both of these cars to begin with. Now why go to all of that trouble of swapping a V8 into the car and then even more time, money and fabrication into turbocharging it, just doesnt seem to make sense to me when you could make pretty much the same HP numbers with whats already in there.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tt-ls1-skyline/191845)._