# turbo civic vs heffner twin turbo gallardo

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [December 29, 2009, 12:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419 "2009-12-29T12:23:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdi\_logik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tdi_logik/32/6310_2.png) [@tdi\_logik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tdi_logik)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 12:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/1 "2009-12-29T12:23:23Z")

</div>

[http://videos.streetfire.net/video/650whp-Civic-vs-Twin\_727051.htm](http://videos.streetfire.net/video/650whp-Civic-vs-Twin_727051.htm)

old dumper is haMMERIN

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GermanPSI](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/germanpsi/32/6353_2.png) [@GermanPSI](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GermanPSI)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 12:25pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/2 "2009-12-29T12:25:31Z")

</div>

LOVE IT!! This just made me want to order more parts. Doing so now…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdi\_logik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tdi_logik/32/6310_2.png) [@tdi\_logik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tdi_logik)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 12:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/3 "2009-12-29T12:30:01Z")

</div>

> [@happy birthday andy! (90NA300ZX)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/happy-birthday-andy-90na300zx/27817/18):
>
> LOVE IT!! This just made me want to order more parts. Doing so now…

thank u

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hooked\_on\_240](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Hooked\_on\_240](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Hooked_on_240)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 12:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/4 "2009-12-29T12:35:50Z")

</div>

o

wow

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![K20power](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/41988e/32.png) [@K20power](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/K20power)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/5 "2009-12-29T13:08:53Z")

</div>

Didn’t seem like the Gallardo was even in it & the Civic seemed like he got the jump hard…idk serious cars though!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:10pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/6 "2009-12-29T13:10:57Z")

</div>

Didnt really look like a legit race… But that civic moves out regardless!!

And 151mph traps with only 650whp? Is that right??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdi\_logik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tdi_logik/32/6310_2.png) [@tdi\_logik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tdi_logik)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/7 "2009-12-29T13:17:36Z")

</div>

> [@OFFICIAL Buffalo Sabres Thread](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-buffalo-sabres-thread/25170/4376):
>
> Didnt really look like a legit race… But that civic moves out regardless!!
> 
> And 151mph traps with only 650whp? Is that right??

at the time of the race he was at ~580 he said.

so yea 650 at 151 sounds right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![K20power](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/41988e/32.png) [@K20power](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/K20power)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/8 "2009-12-29T13:18:10Z")

</div>

> [@OFFICIAL Buffalo Sabres Thread](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-buffalo-sabres-thread/25170/4376):
>
> And 151mph traps with only 650whp? Is that right??

Seems right as opposed to that 1000+whp GT500 you posted trapping 151 :rofl :rofl :rofl

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdi\_logik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tdi_logik/32/6310_2.png) [@tdi\_logik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tdi_logik)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/9 "2009-12-29T13:18:39Z")

</div>

> [@Rare NYSPEED cars, for real.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rare-nyspeed-cars-for-real/27584/118):
>
> Seems right as opposed to that 1000+whp GT500 you posted trapping 151 :rofl :rofl :rofl

yea that shit is wack

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/10 "2009-12-29T13:19:03Z")

</div>

> [@On another topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/27808/4):
>
> at the time of the race he was at ~580 he said.
> 
> so yea 650 at 151 sounds right.

Didnt Mikes car “only”(obvy dont mean only:lol) go 142 with 6XXwhp? I know theres alot of different variables, but that seems like a 700+ trap to me…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![K20power](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/41988e/32.png) [@K20power](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/K20power)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/11 "2009-12-29T13:19:17Z")

</div>

This dude went 161 or 162mph in his 760whp stock block K20, so 151 at 650whp seems like it would be on par

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/12 "2009-12-29T13:19:40Z")

</div>

> [@Rare NYSPEED cars, for real.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rare-nyspeed-cars-for-real/27584/118):
>
> Seems right as opposed to that 1000+whp GT500 you posted trapping 151 :rofl :rofl :rofl

That’ll happen when race weight isnt 1900#'s :lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/13 "2009-12-29T13:20:03Z")

</div>

> [@Why i bought SMG](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-i-bought-smg/27794/20):
>
> This dude went 161 or 162mph in his 760whp stock block K20, so 151 at 650whp seems like it would be on par

Eh, ok lol.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GermanPSI](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/germanpsi/32/6353_2.png) [@GermanPSI](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GermanPSI)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/14 "2009-12-29T13:20:13Z")

</div>

> [@high speed chase...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/high-speed-chase/27831/7):
>
> Didnt Mikes car “only”(obvy dont mean only:lol) go 142 with 6XXwhp? I know theres alot of different variables, but that seems like a 700+ trap to me…

mike was at 580whp when he went 142

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/15 "2009-12-29T13:20:43Z")

</div>

> [@Dumb DMV question?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/dumb-dmv-question/27836/2):
>
> mike was at 580whp when he went 142

Ahh alright, makes more sense now! :thumbup

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdi\_logik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tdi_logik/32/6310_2.png) [@tdi\_logik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tdi_logik)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/16 "2009-12-29T13:22:31Z")

</div>

> [@high speed chase...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/high-speed-chase/27831/7):
>
> Didnt Mikes car “only”(obvy dont mean only:lol) go 142 with 6XXwhp? I know theres alot of different variables, but that seems like a 700+ trap to me…

580whp iirc, could be wrong.

differnt dyno’s different traps as you know already know:lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psi2high](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/psi2high/32/6320_2.png) [@psi2high](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/psi2high)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 1:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/17 "2009-12-29T13:23:44Z")

</div>

Yea high 140’s seems reasonable. Arod’s car made some big power and went mid 150’s didnt it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_hybrdthry91](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/imported_hybrdthry91/32/6315_2.png) [@imported\_hybrdthry91](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_hybrdthry91)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 2:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/18 "2009-12-29T14:53:26Z")

</div>

> [@high speed chase...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/high-speed-chase/27831/7):
>
> Didnt Mikes car “only”(obvy dont mean only:lol) go 142 with 6XXwhp? I know theres alot of different variables, but that seems like a 700+ trap to me…

only made 588whp on the ramhorn setup(ran out of fuel), 142 first pass short shifted 3rd so i figure maybe another 1 or 2 mph, full weight 95 coupe with cage vs who knows what weight. 650whp could definately net 151mph traps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdi\_logik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tdi_logik/32/6310_2.png) [@tdi\_logik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tdi_logik)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 3:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/19 "2009-12-29T15:24:42Z")

</div>

I loved the red coupe!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![6SPD\_S4](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/6spd_s4/32/6326_2.png) [@6SPD\_S4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/6SPD_S4)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 3:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/20 "2009-12-29T15:58:12Z")

</div>

Thanks Peter

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419.md?page=2)
