# turbo civic vs heffner twin turbo gallardo

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [December 29, 2009, 12:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419 "2009-12-29T12:23:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_hybrdthry91](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/imported_hybrdthry91/32/6315_2.png) [@imported\_hybrdthry91](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_hybrdthry91)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2009, 2:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419/18 "2009-12-29T14:53:26Z")

</div>

> [@high speed chase...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/high-speed-chase/27831/7):
>
> Didnt Mikes car “only”(obvy dont mean only:lol) go 142 with 6XXwhp? I know theres alot of different variables, but that seems like a 700+ trap to me…

only made 588whp on the ramhorn setup(ran out of fuel), 142 first pass short shifted 3rd so i figure maybe another 1 or 2 mph, full weight 95 coupe with cage vs who knows what weight. 650whp could definately net 151mph traps.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-vs-heffner-twin-turbo-gallardo/249419)._