# Turbo vs. Procharger, Lt1

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-vs-procharger-lt1/20029>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [November 10, 2006, 11:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-vs-procharger-lt1/20029 "2006-11-10T23:53:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 35

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbo_ls1_ss/32/7303_2.png) [@turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/turbo_ls1_ss)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2006, 4:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-vs-procharger-lt1/20029/35 "2006-11-12T16:22:17Z")

</div>

autos are way faster, t56s are more fun. built t56s cost alot more than th400s. th350, 400s have no OD, 4l80s and t56s do.

pros and cons to both. depends what u want to do with the car, what u like

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-vs-procharger-lt1/20029)._
