# Turbo vs. Procharger, Lt1

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-vs-procharger-lt1/20029>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [November 10, 2006, 11:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-vs-procharger-lt1/20029 "2006-11-10T23:53:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 79

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BaD\_AZz\_Z\_28](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/f04885/32.png) [@BaD\_AZz\_Z\_28](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BaD_AZz_Z_28)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2006, 10:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-vs-procharger-lt1/20029/79 "2006-11-17T10:36:00Z")

</div>

> [@n20junkie](#):
>
> Do you have more of these th-400’s, cause i have a light car with alot of ponies (say a 1,000, 1,200tq) that needs a trans, and if it can hold that kinda torque, i’m wasting my money with a $ 3,500 PG.

Handling 1200+ torque and putting a Bbody into the 10s or 11s are VERY different stresses on a transmission. And to run 11s, a cam bottle and some suspension can go a long way. Anyone who spends $3500+ for a tranny on an 11 second street cruiser has too many dollars and too little sense.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-vs-procharger-lt1/20029)._