# TV guru's

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-gurus/262459>\
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\
**Created:** [January 26, 2012, 7:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-gurus/262459 "2012-01-26T07:52:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![97cavy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/9/c5a1d2/32.png) [@97cavy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/97cavy)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2012, 7:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-gurus/262459/1 "2012-01-26T07:52:30Z")

</div>

I recently moved, and with the layout of the new living room, the 46’’ samsung I have just seems small from the distance I normally watch TV from.

Saw that best buy has this 60’’ sharp lcd for $1k (Minus the $150 in giftcards I have from best buy).

[http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sharp+-+AQUOS+/+60%26%2334%3B+Class+/+LED+/+1080p+/+120Hz+/+HDTV/3690185.p?id=1218426418980&skuId=3690185&st=Sharp\_Score\_Big\_This\_Week&cp=1&lp=1](http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sharp+-+AQUOS+/+60%26%2334%3B+Class+/+LED+/+1080p+/+120Hz+/+HDTV/3690185.p?id=1218426418980&skuId=3690185&st=Sharp_Score_Big_This_Week&cp=1&lp=1)

Anyone see anything wrong with this set? Im not a TV snob, but appreciate a good picture.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![love4boost](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/love4boost/32/6658_2.png) [@love4boost](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/love4boost)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2012, 8:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-gurus/262459/2 "2012-01-26T08:01:51Z")

</div>

seems pretty legit minus the 120hz… id get it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![97cavy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/9/c5a1d2/32.png) [@97cavy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/97cavy)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2012, 8:02am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-gurus/262459/3 "2012-01-26T08:02:54Z")

</div>

Yeah, the one I have now is 240hz, not sure how much of a difference it would make

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![love4boost](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/love4boost/32/6658_2.png) [@love4boost](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/love4boost)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2012, 8:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-gurus/262459/4 "2012-01-26T08:18:57Z")

</div>

> [@ugh...i think we're getting a C4 Vette](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ugh-i-think-were-getting-a-c4-vette/48010/55):
>
> Yeah, the one I have now is 240hz, not sure how much of a difference it would make

pretty sure just in like action scenes when shit is moving there will be a very slight blur, almost un noticable though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6de8d8/32.png) [@Shady](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shady)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2012, 8:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-gurus/262459/5 "2012-01-26T08:23:07Z")

</div>

120HZ is fine… There really IMO is no real difference between 120/240HZ its more of a marketing gimmick. The TV’s at the core is still 60HZ, all the 120/240 is their ability to smooth out the picture, which in most cases ends up making it look fake and giving it that “soap opera” effect.

Basicly the TV’s put in more information then whats being given to smooth out the picture. I personally hate it, but regardless the difference between 120/240 is really not much of anything and more marketing then anything else.

If your not a picture snob then this TV would do the job just fine. Sharps always tend to have a very nice picture.
