# Twomodified4u's Turbo S2000 Build

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/twomodified4us-turbo-s2000-build/248462
**Category:** Builds
**Created:** [November 18, 2009, 3:52pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/twomodified4us-turbo-s2000-build/248462 "2009-11-18T15:52:57Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 343

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![NickAlero](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/nickalero/32/6440_2.png) [@NickAlero](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/NickAlero)
#### Post date: [September 29, 2010, 11:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/twomodified4us-turbo-s2000-build/248462/343 "2010-09-29T23:35:10Z")

</div>

> [@Air bag modules from 2001 Subarus](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/air-bag-modules-from-2001-subarus/35335/5):
>
> The X beam rods are very strong and heavy because they have a large cross sectional area.

They’re not THAT much heavier than a “proper” I beam design you describe. The gain in strength to weight ratio is worth the switch to the X beam design…I don’t think the slight loss of speed of the rotating assembly due to a heavier beam will be noticed, because of how high of a boost level he is putting the car under.

Plus its proven to work. That in itself should be enough.

And this was my 1001st post…wow.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/twomodified4us-turbo-s2000-build/248462)._