# Ugh pharmaceutical sales

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ugh-pharmaceutical-sales/16123>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [August 18, 2006, 11:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ugh-pharmaceutical-sales/16123 "2006-08-18T11:34:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JaysGreenLX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jaysgreenlx/32/7321_2.png) [@JaysGreenLX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JaysGreenLX)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2006, 7:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ugh-pharmaceutical-sales/16123/21 "2006-08-18T19:26:43Z")

</div>

> [@RedGoober4Life](#):
>
> How is HE even qualified to examine ANYTHING?
> 
> Also, my points are very valid. Just because I only listed a few drugs does not mean they’re insignificant. These are people’s lives you are dealing with. I’m sure you wouldn’t say that about your own. “Oh, it was just ONE drug in THOUSANDS. It hardly matters.”

How are you qualified?

No the few drugs listed are not insignificant, however, if you want to start a crusade against companies who have caused loss of life or reduced quality of life, there are plenty more to pursue first.

I’m not saying that drug companies are always in the right, but for them to knowingly market drugs that counteract the very point of their existence seems a little far fetched.

Releasing drugs without full data on its long term effects, sure I can see that. Who could possibly know what would happen with prolonged use for 30 years?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ugh-pharmaceutical-sales/16123)._
