# UPDATED: Esprit photoshoot @ Beaver Island (No 56K)

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/updated-esprit-photoshoot-beaver-island-no-56k/32523>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [July 17, 2007, 2:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/updated-esprit-photoshoot-beaver-island-no-56k/32523 "2007-07-17T14:24:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chino](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/bcef8e/32.png) [@chino](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/chino)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2007, 5:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/updated-esprit-photoshoot-beaver-island-no-56k/32523/32 "2007-07-18T05:48:25Z")

</div>

[quote=“dmoffitt,post:26,topic:32523"”]

car looks great. photographs? not so much.

indirect or diffused flash would have helped. did you use on-camera? or on-hot-shoe-on-camera? get a flash bracket with a detachable hot-shoe-extension-cable and get that flash away from the camera - lighting up the grass looks bad. your flash-vs-exposure-time ratio is way off too, hence why it “looks” like a shot that uses a flash.

[/quote]

agreed on the grass photos, obviously - but that one I commented on earlier, the second picture in the original post I actually really like the “mistake” of the flash vs. exposure time. For some reason it makes the picture look more dramatic, I can’t put my finger on it, something about it is really cool - but I knew that the picture was taken incorrectly by any normal photography standards.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/updated-esprit-photoshoot-beaver-island-no-56k/32523)._