# V6 CAMARO AUTO-X **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [August 27, 2009, 11:14am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/v6-camaro-auto-x/203572 "2009-08-27T11:14:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 14
**Author:** ![4\_door\_love](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/4/e19b73/32.png) [@4\_door\_love](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/4_door_love)\ **Post date:** [August 28, 2009, 8:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/v6-camaro-auto-x/203572/14 "2009-08-28T08:47:48Z")
> [@WTB: Sport Bike $2500 neighborhood](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wtb-sport-bike-2500-neighborhood/40967/7): > > A Camaro/Firebird can do well in the Prepared classes with a very high level of suspension prep, very aggressive alignment, and R-compound tires. Otherwise it is too big, under powered, and has a huge turning radius which will suck balls on tighter course where the V8 cars can’t stretch thier legs and use power to rotate the car. A decent suspension on the Elantra and sticky tires will be far more useful than a Camaro IMO. i would love to put a decent suspension and some sticky tires on my elantra but… 1. i have to drive it (35 to 40,000 miles a year) 2. they dont offer any good struts for the car and im not going to spend my money on GR-2’s and some sub par lowering springs and just have an ok suspension set up. i will never drive a car with coilovers as a dd ever again so coilovers are out. 3. id like to dabble in the rwd community for a while and again i have seen some FS and FSP camaro/firebirds at north park and they look heavy and out of place almost but im pretty confident that a v6 would be a bit more agile though its weight and size… --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/v6-camaro-auto-x/203572)._