# VQ35HR

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/vq35hr/132358>\
**Category:** Canada Nissan Automotive\
**Created:** [November 20, 2006, 10:02am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/vq35hr/132358 "2006-11-20T10:02:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hatch\_bax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/278dde/32.png) [@Hatch\_bax](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Hatch_bax)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2007, 8:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/vq35hr/132358/12 "2007-02-04T20:01:20Z")

</div>

> [@Taffy's 7/17/05 9pm](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/taffys-7-17-05-9pm/875/4):
>
> As far as I can tell, the VQ35HR doesn’t have as much potential in tuning/building up engine as the old VQ35DE rev-up/non-rev-up.
> 
> Also, comparing to the rev-up engine, the power’s nearly identical, the only difference is that they get extra 500hp to keep on going with the power. nothing special really…
> 
> I’m also surprised by the torque numbers. the non-rev-up are suppose to have the greatest torque numbers…
> 
> Non-rev-up - 274lb/tq (crank)  
> Rev-up - 260lb/tq (crank)  
> VQ35HR - 268lb/tq (crank)
> 
> Numbers directly from nissan.
> 
> Basically, my car is suppose to have the most kick 😛

How can you say the tuning potential for the HR isn’t as good as the DE? We haven’t even seen the beginning of aftermarket mods for the HR yet! 😕

And keep this in mind, too: the HP and TQ ratings for the HR are with the new, revised SAE standards which are designed to be closer to actual HP at the wheels (i.e. lower than before). So, under the new system, our DE would have less than 287 HP and less than 274 TQ, or the HE would have higher than 308 and 268 under the old system.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/vq35hr/132358)._
