# We got our first Camaro SS in **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [April 27, 2009, 2:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635 "2009-04-27T14:21:31Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 8
**Author:** ![foxrus14](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f05b48/32.png) [@foxrus14](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/foxrus14)\ **Post date:** [May 9, 2009, 7:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635/141 "2009-05-09T19:11:07Z")
135 = Chick car… I only see girls driving it. may as well buy a boxter too ---
**Author:** ![Zack01GC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/a183cd/32.png) [@Zack01GC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zack01GC)\ **Post date:** [May 9, 2009, 10:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635/142 "2009-05-09T22:51:12Z")
> [@OFFICIAL '07-'08 BUFFALO SABRES SEASON THREAD](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-07-08-buffalo-sabres-season-thread/36504/646): > > Yeah, I agree, but they are still bad ass. I think I could actually deal with an auto in one of those Black Series cars 😃 Don’t get me wrong, I’d rock a CLK63 all day. ---
**Author:** ![Orr89rocz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac91a4/32.png) [@Orr89rocz](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Orr89rocz)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2009, 3:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635/143 "2009-05-10T15:21:08Z")
> 20 yr old german cars look at home on the road today as they did when new. I’d kinda disagree, they dont look much better than any 80’s car…still outdated on the road ---
**Author:** ![tjZ28](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@tjZ28](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tjZ28)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2009, 7:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635/144 "2009-05-10T19:42:05Z")
> [@Winter Storm Warning starting Saturday night (12/15)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/winter-storm-warning-starting-saturday-night-12-15/40289/63): > > I’d kinda disagree, they dont look much better than any 80’s car…still outdated on the road Seriously, this is a 20 year old German car: Nobody can tell me that looks modern on the road still. Shit, this is a **10** year old German car and I think it looks very, very dated: -TJ ---
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2009, 5:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635/145 "2009-05-11T05:36:29Z")
> [@I am Legend 12/14 Regal](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-am-legend-12-14-regal/40280/14): > > that is the thing about it dics. I DON’T CARE. you are the magazine racer… i never brought my personal car into the conversation, you did. you can continue to circle jerk your nurburgring lap times to sleep at night knowing that some car that you read about in magazines is better than my daily driver :kekegay: :petty: > > and shouldn’t an economy german coupe BE slower than a brand new hyped v8 muscle car??? :duh: dipshit > > that would be great in the z28… i just hope it doesn’t weigh in at 5500lbs The point is I can give a fuck less if you care or not. I just wanted to point out that when you cut on shit you have no idea what you are talking about…you are an idiot douchebag that just sees a thread about a car you obviously don’t give two shits about and you chime in with your ignorant comments calling it garbage and making comments about the performance when you have no idea what you are talking about. But hey if that’s what you do to get your vagina all moist then that is all you. What’s the big deal if I use Nurburgring lap times to get an idea of how a car performs? In your eyes unless you take a car to the track and test it yourself then you have no right talking about the performance…stfu you are an idiot. The only reason why I pointed out the lap times is to make a point that on a race track it is capable of keeping pace with some impressive cars…that is it. So keep clicking on threads about cars you don’t care about and keep on making lame ignorant comments….I wouldn’t expect anything less from a smug wanna be yuppie douchbag. ---
**Author:** ![tjZ28](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@tjZ28](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tjZ28)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2009, 5:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635/146 "2009-05-11T05:39:24Z")
Well, I know the LS3 'vettes open up with full exhaust and a tune, but I don’t know if even I believe these numbers: [http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Fastlane-2010-Camaro-1\_681551.htm](http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Fastlane-2010-Camaro-1_681551.htm) 400/414 RWHP/RWTQ with a CAI, LT Headers/full exhaust and a tune. A 72/66 RWHP/RWTQ gain versus stock. The LS3s also open up a bit after 2-3k miles, so maybe the baseline was done at really low miles and they’ve got the car past 3k now too. But even still, I’m not sure. -TJ EDIT: thinking about it the stock RWHP is really low for 426 crank hp. In this vid [ame=“[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN2GGzlX0QE](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN2GGzlX0QE)”]YouTube - 2010 Camaro SS on Livernois Motorsports Dyno[/ame] a stock one does 364/371 stock which is a lot more like it. It looks like the Fastlane guys are playing with the stock numbers. However, the 400/414 RWHP/RWTQ w/ CAI, LTs, exhaust and tune I actually think sounds about right. Looking around on corvetteforum a lot of LS3 C6s are doing 400+ on similar mods. I’ve seen a few 420+ RWHP cars with the same mods and maybe a pulley, most of those have a lot more miles on them so they’re fully opened up. Regardless, w/ a cam I think we’ll see 450+ RWHP stock longblock (ie no ported heads etc) 5th Gen Camaros. 😃 ---
**Author:** ![flyinglow57](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/flyinglow57/32/5978_2.png) [@flyinglow57](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/flyinglow57)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2009, 2:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635/147 "2009-05-11T14:04:43Z")
> [@FS: or FT: 1990 Crx 5 speed](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-or-ft-1990-crx-5-speed/40175/20): > > Well, I know the LS3 'vettes open up with full exhaust and a tune, but I don’t know if even I believe these numbers: > > [http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Fastlane-2010-Camaro-1\_681551.htm](http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Fastlane-2010-Camaro-1_681551.htm) > > 400/414 RWHP/RWTQ with a CAI, LT Headers/full exhaust and a tune. A 72/66 RWHP/RWTQ gain versus stock. The LS3s also open up a bit after 2-3k miles, so maybe the baseline was done at really low miles and they’ve got the car past 3k now too. But even still, I’m not sure. > > -TJ > > EDIT: thinking about it the stock RWHP is really low for 426 crank hp. In this vid [YouTube - 2010 Camaro SS on Livernois Motorsports Dyno](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN2GGzlX0QE) a stock one does 364/371 stock which is a lot more like it. It looks like the Fastlane guys are playing with the stock numbers. However, the 400/414 RWHP/RWTQ w/ CAI, LTs, exhaust and tune I actually think sounds about right. Looking around on corvetteforum a lot of LS3 C6s are doing 400+ on similar mods. I’ve seen a few 420+ RWHP cars with the same mods and maybe a pulley, most of those have a lot more miles on them so they’re fully opened up. Regardless, w/ a cam I think we’ll see 450+ RWHP stock longblock (ie no ported heads etc) 5th Gen Camaros. 😃 TJ if you look at the comments on that video he used the wrong baseline… he said the stock one had 355 i think… so a 45 hp gain seems a lil high but nothing out of ordinary. most of the ones i have seen are doing 366 stock… they have 2.5 duals on them stock i believe… so headers and some muffla’s with stock true duals on the ls3 should be pretty nice… the l99’s exhaust are way more constricted to keep the tone of the cyl deactivation down. [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/we-got-our-first-camaro-ss-in/202635.md?page=7)