# Were Hondas only cool in 1994? **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [February 8, 2012, 7:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362 "2012-02-08T19:46:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 5
**Author:** ![Shockwave179](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shockwave179/32/7496_2.png) [@Shockwave179](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shockwave179)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 1:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/81 "2012-02-09T13:54:27Z")
> [@93dx--hatch](#): > > I thinkg Shockwave is the worst,srsly :hay: > [@yamba6](#): > > People who like Honda’s = People who cant afford expensive cars, respect for vehicles, mom and dad didnt buy them their cars. > > People who hate Honda’s = People who’s parents have bought them everything, ones that have never owned one, bought one with over 200k miles and thought it would be the greatest car ever and it broke down at 250k. People that only hang around with Bro’s and Rich People > > personally, I think Honda’s are the shit. And not because of owning an s2k, but the fact that they produce some very good quality vehicles, very inexpensive upgrades that can make the car faster and better at handling over these extremely expensive cars that would cost the same stock. To hate on a company that can give you an amazing 1/4 mile time for very cheap and being extremely easy to fix… not sure you really are into the “car scene” then. > > Edit: Other companies provided inexpensive upgrades for the Honda. \* LOL This is by far the funniest thing I have read all week. ---
**Author:** ![jt76](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jt76/32/5100_2.png) [@jt76](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/jt76)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 2:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/82 "2012-02-09T14:12:57Z")
> [@Minglor](#): > > I still like crxs. > > And Honda engines in things like atoms. > > Honda “scene” has a poor reputation just like the VW “scene” does too. > > I could make a thread titled “Were VWs ever cool?” and get a bunch of people hating on PBR drinking hipster fggts. > > Even better - “were mazdas ever cool?” and get a people saying the best place for a miata is the front of a gay pride parade and in a hair dresser’s garage. I have to admit… PBR isn’t horrible… ---
**Author:** ![Jim1234664](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jim1234664/32/7438_2.png) [@Jim1234664](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jim1234664)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 2:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/83 "2012-02-09T14:17:57Z")
> [@Skurge](#): > > i’m assuming that this whole thread is directed at civics/accords, because i dont know many people in 1994 that would have thought that this was not cool: > > ![http://static.cargurus.com/images/site/2008/01/04/10/16/1994_honda_nsx-pic-47973.jpeg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/c/1/c1de09d43834e542a311da2f9b99abbabea9c3a4.jpeg) I bet everyone would have thought that was cool in 1994, unfortunately they had to wait until 2002 when Honda started making them ---
**Author:** ![Oasis24-7](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/c89c15/32.png) [@Oasis24-7](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Oasis24-7)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 2:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/84 "2012-02-09T14:30:07Z")
Thats it im not going to mighty anymore, you guys are all haters ;( ---
**Author:** ![GV1390](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/gv1390/32/5432_2.png) [@GV1390](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GV1390)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 3:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/85 "2012-02-09T15:41:27Z")
> [@Jam](#): > > My friends mom actually did own a 95 eg coupe and bought it brand new. I thought it was cool, bc it was stick shift, just like my dads alfa. When you’re 11, stick shift = SPORTS CAR! Love Alfas. ---
**Author:** ![seth13](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/seth13/32/8038_2.png) [@seth13](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/seth13)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 4:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/86 "2012-02-09T16:20:35Z")
> [@Jim1234664](#): > > I bet everyone would have thought that was cool in 1994, unfortunately they had to wait until 2002 when Honda started making them The first year of NSX production was 1990. Unless you just meant that the NSX without the flip-ups that came out in 2002? which is likely. What does shockwave drive just out of curiosity? ---
**Author:** ![livin4hockey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/d2c977/32.png) [@livin4hockey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/livin4hockey)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 4:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/87 "2012-02-09T16:44:59Z")
> [@seth13](#): > > The first year of NSX production was 1990. Unless you just meant that the NSX without the flip-ups that came out in 2002? which is likely. What does shockwave drive just out of curiosity? I think he was just pointing out a technicality that the NSX was “produced” by Acura. ---
**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 5:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/88 "2012-02-09T17:02:51Z")
> [@boardjnky4](#): > > ANY car can be a bucket of fail in the wrong hands… The problem being that the majority of Honda builds ASPIRED to be a bucket of fail. The whole point was to build a turbo monster that could only do highway pulls. ---
**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 5:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/89 "2012-02-09T17:04:33Z")
> [@JayS](#): > > The problem being that the majority of Honda builds ASPIRED to be a bucket of fail. The whole point was to build a turbo monster that could only do highway pulls. So only being able to do 60mph rolls isn’t cool? :lol: Where is Beck he would do that BS back with his sub 300hp civic :lol: ---
**Author:** ![seth13](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/seth13/32/8038_2.png) [@seth13](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/seth13)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 5:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/90 "2012-02-09T17:12:20Z")
> [@livin4hockey](#): > > I think he was just pointing out a technicality that the NSX was “produced” by Acura. In the US yeah. But we had the Acura NSX sub '02 as well. ---
**Author:** ![livin4hockey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/d2c977/32.png) [@livin4hockey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/livin4hockey)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 5:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/91 "2012-02-09T17:44:01Z")
Yes I know, but it still wasn’t a “Honda” as in not badged that way. ---
**Author:** ![MrSmith](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mrsmith/32/5254_2.png) [@MrSmith](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MrSmith)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 5:48pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/92 "2012-02-09T17:48:20Z")
> [@JayS](#): > > The problem being that the majority of Honda builds ASPIRED to be a bucket of fail. The whole point was to build a turbo monster that could only do highway pulls. I remember pulling into packed parking lots with my turbo bucket of fail built strictly for highway rolls and everyone and their mother regardless of what they owned would stare/come over to look at it. That car was pretty fucking cool in its day. Prolly cooler than any 04+ GTO that has ever roamed the streets in Buffalo as a matter of fact. 😛 The best fwd platform ever made for going fast will always be cool in my book. My Accord Crosstour is not cool. Would be kinda cool if it was slammed and HFPd out… but I am too cheap to spend money on it. ---
**Author:** ![fairgentleman\_Z](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fairgentleman_z/32/7263_2.png) [@fairgentleman\_Z](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fairgentleman_Z)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 6:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/93 "2012-02-09T18:11:02Z")
Buying **any** make or model to make yourself look cool = you’re lame. Buying **any** make or model to be part of a “scene” = you and your friends are lame. Buying a car based on cost vs. performance for your income = not cool, but better than being lame. I’ve raced against enough Hondas to respect them. > [@JayS](#): > > The problem being that the majority of Honda builds ASPIRED to be a bucket of fail. The whole point was to build a turbo monster that could only do highway pulls. So what’s wrong with NA Civics? ---
**Author:** ![seth13](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/seth13/32/8038_2.png) [@seth13](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/seth13)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 6:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/94 "2012-02-09T18:43:19Z")
> [@fairgentleman Z](#): > > Buying **any** make or model to make yourself look cool = you’re lame. > Buying **any** make or model to be part of a “scene” = you and your friends are lame. > Buying a car based on cost vs. performance for your income = not cool, but better than being lame. > > I’ve raced against enough Hondas to respect them. > > So what’s wrong with NA Civics? I don’t see the problem with buying a car based on cost vs performance for your income or budget. I understand having preferences but sometimes when you don’t make a lot of money you try to get the most bang for your buck. I know as I’m pricing out my next car I have to do that to an extent. I make very little money but want something fun to drive and thats not a complete dog. However I totally agree that buying a car based on a scene or what will make you look cool is stupid. ---
**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 6:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/95 "2012-02-09T18:47:56Z")
> [@JayS](#): > > The problem being that the majority of Honda builds ASPIRED to be a bucket of fail. The whole point was to build a turbo monster that could only do highway pulls. Two words: Jew fro ---
**Author:** ![Justin](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/justin/32/7459_2.png) [@Justin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Justin)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 7:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/96 "2012-02-09T19:27:29Z")
Never ---
**Author:** ![Skurge](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/skurge/32/7285_2.png) [@Skurge](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Skurge)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2012, 5:59am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/97 "2012-02-10T05:59:08Z")
> [@Jim1234664](#): > > I bet everyone would have thought that was cool in 1994, unfortunately they had to wait until 2002 when Honda started making them honda always made them, they were just badged as an acura in the US, either way, the damn thing is made by honda… ---
**Author:** ![MPD47](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mpd47/32/7383_2.png) [@MPD47](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MPD47)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2012, 6:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/98 "2012-02-10T06:01:17Z")
He’s commenting on the fact that it is a 2002+ NSX, not the make of it. ---
**Author:** ![newman](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/newman/32/7569_2.png) [@newman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/newman)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2012, 6:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/99 "2012-02-10T06:05:23Z")
> [@MPD47](#): > > He’s commenting on the fact that it is a 2002+ NSX, not the make of it. This. Retards. ---
**Author:** ![Neon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/f19dbf/32.png) [@Neon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Neon)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2012, 6:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362/100 "2012-02-10T06:12:55Z")
> [@LZ](#): > > Evo/WRX are the new Mustang/F-body for kids :lol: Damn, imports! Are you 50 years old? [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362.md?page=4) [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/were-hondas-only-cool-in-1994/220362.md?page=6)