# Wet vs Dry nitrous kits

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [February 28, 2006, 6:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634 "2006-02-28T06:07:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hycomp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Hycomp](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Hycomp)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 11:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/21 "2006-02-28T11:52:45Z")

</div>

Other things to consider when choosing between a wet or dry set-up is:

Wet kits spray fuel and nitrous which is typically easier to add in as at most just timing needs adjusted to be spraying

Depending on placement of jet(s) in a dry set-up the nitrous may not evenly distribute among cylinders so a fuel system with upped injectors/fuel pressure/longer pulsewidths/etc. which is adding an equally increased amount of fuel to each cylinder may run lean on a cylinder getting more nitrous. A wet set-up spraying fuel and nitrous would tend to account for this problem as both fuel and nitrous are sprayed together at the same point.

I believe at least some of the wet kits have safety checks that if fuel pressure is lacking at the fuel solenoid the nitrous solenoid will not open.

Also, a wet shot can be upped for more power by merely swapping a couple jets whereas a dry set-up pushing any kind of decent power (beyond the little 55-75 shot zex kits) is going to require more adjustments.

Safest set-up on 4 bangers seems to be a nice wet direct port set-up, $600+  
best way to get 50+hp (especially if going for 100+)

I’ve seen many crappy dry zex kits eat motors

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 11:59am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/22 "2006-02-28T11:59:06Z")

</div>

dry kit, just change the bypass jet and shim the regulator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 12:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/23 "2006-02-28T12:19:36Z")

</div>

> [@Quik](#):
>
> for your return less system. for the 97-98 Y bodys and the 99-02 trucks its after the maf. since it has a return system. now on the newer trucks and F bodys no return line so you would have to use the maf to increase the fuel. :booty:

wrong!next!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 12:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/24 "2006-02-28T12:33:33Z")

</div>

> [@pewterss](#):
>
> wrong!next!

how am i wrong? please explain. with a return line you have a regulator and it has vaccum going to it. this way you can use the vaccum to help increase fuel psi. thats how my NOS kit is done on the 5.3. works no issues

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 12:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/25 "2006-02-28T12:46:14Z")

</div>

still not as good as its own fuel sorce

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 12:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/26 "2006-02-28T12:49:16Z")

</div>

> [@pewterss](#):
>
> still not as good as its own fuel sorce

poop for wet systems unless plate or direct port :blue:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 12:50pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/27 "2006-02-28T12:50:30Z")

</div>

zex sucks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 12:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/28 "2006-02-28T12:51:09Z")

</div>

> [@pewterss](#):
>
> zex sucks

sorry chad, he said it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Swarzkopf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7feea3/32.png) [@Swarzkopf](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Swarzkopf)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 1:10pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/29 "2006-02-28T13:10:20Z")

</div>

Good posts (at least pertaining to the Mustang world) Quik…

I’m NOT a fan of the old style wet kits which run fuel through the upper manifold of a 5.0 Mustang…these are pretty unsafe in my opinion.

Actually, I’m not such a fan of wet kits in general that flow fuel through manifolds designed for air only. Remember the video of the Z06 exploding at the track? That was the result of fuel puddling in the intake due to a wet kit and then igniting due to a backfire.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![T70\_Tsi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/898d66/32.png) [@T70\_Tsi](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/T70_Tsi)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 1:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/30 "2006-02-28T13:12:59Z")

</div>

direct port close to the injector is what i’m running, no more fuel puddle there than you’d find stock

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Swarzkopf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7feea3/32.png) [@Swarzkopf](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Swarzkopf)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 1:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/31 "2006-02-28T13:19:16Z")

</div>

Yeah, no doubt that direct port injection is the best.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 1:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/32 "2006-02-28T13:19:40Z")

</div>

> [@Swarzkopf](#):
>
> Good posts (at least pertaining to the Mustang world) Quik…
> 
> I’m NOT a fan of the old style wet kits which run fuel through the upper manifold of a 5.0 Mustang…these are pretty unsafe in my opinion.
> 
> Actually, I’m not such a fan of wet kits in general that flow fuel through manifolds designed for air only. Remember the video of the Z06 exploding at the track? That was the result of fuel puddling in the intake due to a wet kit and then igniting due to a backfire.

yep like i stated. especially with the how EFI intakes hit a wall when the air comes into them. and osme times fuell will be trapped and puddle. then you get to see the pretty affects. i seen a pic of a cobra intake tht was re weldedup after boost and juice went wrong. the wet system failed and led to the intake to explode. then the guy had someone fix it for a temp fix for the weekend at the event

now im all for a plate system. thats what ill be using for my hatch. on the stangs they look stealth. like a heat spacer so to the common eye no body would expect anything else then a heat spacer. these kits do cost more but are worth it since the shot is almost endless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![T70\_Tsi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/898d66/32.png) [@T70\_Tsi](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/T70_Tsi)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 1:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/33 "2006-02-28T13:21:44Z")

</div>

i dont’ care if people see it i’m not trying to hide anything to say i’m still stock. on a side note my ecu will shut the shit down if timing is pulled

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Streetnstrip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7bcc69/32.png) [@Streetnstrip](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Streetnstrip)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2006, 3:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634/34 "2006-02-28T15:58:21Z")

</div>

who The Fuck Cars Run What U Want But Dont Be A Pussy Push it To Its Limites And Hope She Doesnt Blow :d

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wet-vs-dry-nitrous-kits/180634.md?page=1)
