# What should I do?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-should-i-do/185650>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [October 17, 2006, 9:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-should-i-do/185650 "2006-10-17T09:19:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 84

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![taco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ec9cab/32.png) [@taco](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/taco)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2006, 6:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-should-i-do/185650/84 "2006-10-26T18:01:23Z")

</div>

> [@food past midnight?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/food-past-midnight/25358/32):
>
> oh and NA what has the fastest windsor or modular ford run?

I don’t know and I’m not looking it up. What has the fastest lsx naturally aspirated run??

I am going to say it’s a safe bet that a windsor ford has ran a faster naturally aspirated et than an lsx based on the fact that you can get at least as many cubic inches out of a windsor block as an lsx block and I belive you can get more out of a windsor. Also you can get higher flowing cylinder heads for a 351w than for a lsx. So with the same or more cubic inches and better cylinder heads it can only be assumed that faster times have been ran with a 351w than a lsx.

To answer you next question these heads would be, Blue thunder, brodix - neal, yates sc-1, chi, edelbrock victor, tfs hi ports, and maybe a few others I am overlooking.

The lsx is a fine engine, I am seriously considering getting a c5 if I get a company vehicle and don’t have to worry about practicality.

BUT, GM didn’t reinvent the wheel with it and it isn’t any better than anything else. It’s a fine engine and as it is around longer better speed parts will be made for it. However there is nothing inherently better about it than any other small block engine.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-should-i-do/185650)._