# What would you do? (GM Situation)

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-would-you-do-gm-situation/201960>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [February 22, 2009, 4:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-would-you-do-gm-situation/201960 "2009-02-22T16:16:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![S10Blazed\_Si](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/s10blazed_si/32/5983_2.png) [@S10Blazed\_Si](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/S10Blazed_Si)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2009, 5:32am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-would-you-do-gm-situation/201960/25 "2009-02-24T05:32:32Z")

</div>

> [@FS: 2000 Mustang GT $4700 42K original miles](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-2000-mustang-gt-4700-42k-original-miles/39704/15):
>
> all honestly i don’t see any financial gain by designing a motor that is more complex to keep up with technology. i am a firm believer in keeping it simple. makes maintinance easier and cheaper to maintain.

Well it’s too bad we live in a world of technology and advancement. People expect that these days. Especially when you are comparing 2 cars. The one with more ‘technology’ will have the edge. Plus advertisers eat up fancy technological buzz words.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-would-you-do-gm-situation/201960)._
