# Which import "remake" was more disapointing than the original?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [July 24, 2005, 4:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867 "2005-07-24T16:15:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jinxxycat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/71c47a/32.png) [@jinxxycat](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/jinxxycat)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 11:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/21 "2005-07-25T11:22:02Z")

</div>

I am a little biased. Z\>8

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 11:27am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/22 "2005-07-25T11:27:05Z")

</div>

> [@Gay05](#):
>
> wrong and wrong

> [@whitey](#):
>
> 300zx != 350z  
> RX7 != RX8
> 
> GTO = GTO  
> Charger = Charger

thanks 💏

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 11:57am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/23 "2005-07-25T11:57:44Z")

</div>

like was said before…they are not remake  
but i wouldn’t mind either one…i like both the RX8 & the 350Z, would i own one…probably not, cause there is a lot of other stuff i’d rather have for that money.

would i drive a 350Z or RX8 = yes  
would i buy a 350Z or RX8 = probably not

would i drive a GTO or Charger = NO  
would i buy a GTO or Charger = definately NOT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 12:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/24 "2005-07-25T12:14:48Z")

</div>

> [@showtime](#):
>
> like was said before…they are not remake  
> but i wouldn’t mind either one…i like both the RX8 & the 350Z, would i own one…probably not, cause there is a lot of other stuff i’d rather have for that money.
> 
> would i drive a 350Z or RX8 = yes  
> would i buy a 350Z or RX8 = probably not
> 
> would i drive a GTO or Charger = NO  
> would i buy a GTO or Charger = definately NOT

as much as I hate the GTO name and what it stands for, I would still rather have one of those compared to the z, rx8, or the charger. It is a descent car, I just don’t think it lives up to the name of “GTO”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fshowcars](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fshowcars/32/5937_2.png) [@fshowcars](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fshowcars)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 12:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/25 "2005-07-25T12:22:25Z")

</div>

bottom line: gto’s are the bestest cars ever built (until bluez28 sells his)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rookee](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rookee/32/5972_2.png) [@rookee](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rookee)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 12:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/26 "2005-07-25T12:27:22Z")

</div>

> [@fshowcars](#):
>
> bottom line: gto’s are the bestest cars ever built (until the lease is up or he uses up all his alotted mileage)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fshowcars](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fshowcars/32/5937_2.png) [@fshowcars](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fshowcars)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 12:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/27 "2005-07-25T12:44:52Z")

</div>

🤣

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 2:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/28 "2005-07-25T14:28:23Z")

</div>

I say the rx-8

I raced one on I-70 just outside cincinatti to columbus the entire way.

I couldnt leave him far behind from 90+ roll. but we drop down to 20-30mph a ton of times, I would get 5-6 easy cars before 100.  
The greatest Trip ever :boink 🆒  
made it to pittsburgh from cincy in 3.5 hours that night

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 2:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/29 "2005-07-25T14:29:16Z")

</div>

> [@fshowcars](#):
>
> bottom line: gto’s are the bestest cars ever built (until bluez28 has to finally move out of his mom’s house and pay bills and realizes he cant afford the lease anymore)

fixed

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rookee](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rookee/32/5972_2.png) [@rookee](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rookee)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 2:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/30 "2005-07-25T14:31:40Z")

</div>

we rode that joke long enough now :down: :greddy:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 2:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/31 "2005-07-25T14:33:26Z")

</div>

> [@Rustang JIM](#):
>
> I say the rx-8
> 
> I raced one on I-70 just outside cincinatti to columbus the entire way.
> 
> I couldnt leave him far behind from 90+ roll. but we drop down to 20-30mph a ton of times, I would get 5-6 easy cars before 100.  
> The greatest Trip ever :boink 🆒  
> made it to pittsburgh from cincy in 3.5 hours that night

I’d like everyone to remember that stock RX-7s and 300ZX’s arent exactly pavement pounding demons of destruction either. stock FD RX-7’s only made 250hp. 300zx TT’s made 300, but weighed a lot more. Mid-low 14 sec cars. The “new versions” really arent that far behind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 2:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/32 "2005-07-25T14:34:18Z")

</div>

> [@rookee](#):
>
> we rode that joke long enough now :down: :greddy:

its not a joke though… :slap:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 2:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/33 "2005-07-25T14:35:43Z")

</div>

> [@Darkstar](#):
>
> I’d like everyone to remember that stock RX-7s and 300ZX’s arent exactly pavement pounding demons of destruction either. stock FD RX-7’s only made 250hp. 300zx TT’s made 300, but weighed a lot more. Mid-low 14 sec cars. The “new versions” really arent that far behind.

Ummm if i rolled raced the last generation rx-7 with a turbo no way in hell could i ever beat it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dgramc](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/dgramc/32/5934_2.png) [@dgramc](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/dgramc)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 11:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/34 "2005-07-25T23:05:29Z")

</div>

im not a big fan of the rx-8 i think its the rear doors…i just dont like them

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vw16vcabby](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vw16vcabby/32/5943_2.png) [@vw16vcabby](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/vw16vcabby)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2005, 11:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867/35 "2005-07-25T23:40:23Z")

</div>

the 350 z follows the z line… as you had the 240, 280, 300 etc z’s. the number came from displacement.

the rx-8 does not continue the lineage of the rx7. that would be like saying the rx7 was the next generation of the rx3… so in that deffense, the rx8 is a “new” car, allthough we all know it was made to follow in the lines of the rx7, i.e. a sporty rotary.

the rx8 is deffinitely a let down. the 350z has tons of potential w/ afternarket, the rx8 is the black sheep that was neglected.

thats my 2 pennies

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/which-import-remake-was-more-disapointing-than-the-original/175867.md?page=1)
