# Why do most of the 240s on here still suck??

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-do-most-of-the-240s-on-here-still-suck/123332>\
**Category:** SON240sx Off Topic\
**Created:** [April 7, 2009, 6:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-do-most-of-the-240s-on-here-still-suck/123332 "2009-04-07T18:31:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 297

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GTS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/82dd89/32.png) [@GTS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GTS)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2009, 12:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-do-most-of-the-240s-on-here-still-suck/123332/297 "2009-04-08T12:28:55Z")

</div>

> [@Teach me about snowboarding](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/teach-me-about-snowboarding/21339/8):
>
> lol chinese sam u are da man. sorry my english is horrible. its missing a few words.  
> 70% of son240 240s are shit rusted falling apart .  
> 10% actually LOOK nice (out of the 30%). 30% are pretty fast(and not rusted to shit)

Season, you still confused me. Let me see if I understand…

=100 cars  
70 cars are rusted and falling apart  
30 cars are fast  
10 (out of the previous 30) actually look nice which means 20 cars are fast but ugly.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-do-most-of-the-240s-on-here-still-suck/123332)._
