# Why Ford still stands alone

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [June 9, 2009, 5:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919 "2009-06-09T17:00:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jam](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jam/32/7235_2.png) [@Jam](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jam)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2009, 6:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919/21 "2009-06-11T06:49:25Z")

</div>

> [@Violator](#):
>
> Looks like its still based on the “Refrigerator Size” modular block architecture.  
> That motor is a fat pig and will not fit as nice as a 5.o or LsX small block.  
> Bobcat is a GAY fucking name. I thought they were building fucking Skid Steer loaders.  
> Idiots. Call it fucking Tulip or something… just as gay.

RRRAAAAAARRRRRRR!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigRon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/58956e/32.png) [@BigRon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigRon)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2009, 6:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919/22 "2009-06-11T06:51:28Z")

</div>

So how do you compare MPG when two different liquids are being used at the same time?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![somedude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecd19e/32.png) [@somedude](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/somedude)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2009, 10:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919/23 "2009-06-11T22:01:03Z")

</div>

> [@BigRon](#):
>
> So how do you compare MPG when two different liquids are being used at the same time?

well. I know this is complicated and all but try and follow along. You take the miles driven and divide it by the amount of fuel used.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbo_ls1_ss/32/7303_2.png) [@turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/turbo_ls1_ss)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2009, 10:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919/24 "2009-06-11T22:17:40Z")

</div>

F-series, E-series, all.

a lot of the stuff we sell is on the E450-E750 chassis. I’m pretty sure all of them have the X (as far as offering diesel in these trucks) for 2010, but definitely E,F450 are X’ed. It makes no sense, because it is a popular platform.

just this week, Chevy X’d its 5500, 6500, and 8500 lines, which has us back on the drawing table since we have a BIG, BIG contract signed and ready to rock based on these chassis.

the economy is EFFFFFED right now, and it’s finally starting to hit us

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wookie](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/wookie/32/5153_2.png) [@Wookie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Wookie)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2009, 10:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919/25 "2009-06-11T22:37:11Z")

</div>

The GM humping/Ford bashing is strong in this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbo_ls1_ss/32/7303_2.png) [@turbo\_ls1\_ss](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/turbo_ls1_ss)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2009, 5:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919/26 "2009-06-12T05:30:35Z")

</div>

> [@Wookie](#):
>
> The GM humping/Ford bashing is strong in this thread.

no it’s not

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jt76](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jt76/32/5100_2.png) [@jt76](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/jt76)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2009, 10:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919/27 "2009-06-12T10:18:36Z")

</div>

lol ford made something cool that will never see the light of day. Guess thats bashing them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wookie](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/wookie/32/5153_2.png) [@Wookie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Wookie)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2009, 10:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919/28 "2009-06-12T10:38:40Z")

</div>

> [@Toda Party](#):
>
> then again a 5.0-liter V-8 with twin turbos making 500/750 doesn’t seem like progress, more like finally w/ the times haha

Bashing

> [@Joe](#):
>
> They need to come out with this so GM can adapt it to an LSx and make it 1500/1750 :lol:

Humping

> [@blk99z28](#):
>
> GM’s 4.5L diesel with the intake on the outside of the banks and a turbo in the “v” was pretty pimp. A shame lack of funding made them kill it. Would have been a great engine.

Humping, kinda

> [@jt76](#):
>
> zr1

Humping

> [@Violator](#):
>
> Looks like its still based on the “Refrigerator Size” modular block architecture.  
> That motor is a fat pig and will not fit as nice as a 5.o or LsX small block.  
> Bobcat is a GAY fucking name. I thought they were building fucking Skid Steer loaders.  
> Idiots. Call it fucking Tulip or something… just as gay.

Bashing

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-ford-still-stands-alone/68919.md?page=1)
