# Wideband suggestions

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [January 13, 2006, 1:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809 "2006-01-13T13:03:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![woz](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/woz/32/7605_2.png) [@woz](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/woz)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2006, 1:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/1 "2006-01-13T13:03:57Z")

</div>

ok so im looking for a wideband W/data logging, just wondering if any1 suggests one over another and why. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![focusinprogress](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/focusinprogress/32/7227_2.png) [@focusinprogress](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/focusinprogress)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2006, 4:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/2 "2006-01-23T16:18:03Z")

</div>

innovative LC-1 is a cheap one capable of this, it comes with software to datalog on a laptop/computer and also has an analog output to mock a stock signal, that signal is also programmable so you can trick the computer to think 13:1 is 14.5:1 for example. that or a PLX is a good choice. if looking to splurge for the best get a zeitronix

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Choda](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/choda/32/7347_2.png) [@Choda](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Choda)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2006, 4:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/3 "2006-01-23T16:26:50Z")

</div>

:word:  
ive had one in my car. heard nothing but good about them

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HotRodKid](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hotrodkid/32/7609_2.png) [@HotRodKid](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HotRodKid)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2006, 4:45pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/4 "2006-01-23T16:45:55Z")

</div>

bah … the lc1 pisses me right the fuck off …

with an rpm logging channel on the lc1, your as good as guessing on where you have to adjust the fuel curve … unless you can stare at the tach and the laptop at the same time

get the zeitronix unit , change the map for analog out 1 so that 12:1 actual fuel ratio = the 14.7:1 output voltage, then splice that output into the front o2 wire

splice in your rpm wires and such, plug into your laptop , take a cruise around the block and watch your ecu tune itself for 12:1 when in closed loop … it will THINK its aiming for 14.7:1

after that, go highway tune …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carnut](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/carnut/32/7590_2.png) [@Carnut](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Carnut)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2006, 5:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/5 "2006-01-23T17:01:32Z")

</div>

I would not recommend that at all.

I would recommend the Zeitronixs or the LM1 not the LC1 as that was crap.

If you need one PM me I can get you a good deal on one 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HotRodKid](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hotrodkid/32/7609_2.png) [@HotRodKid](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HotRodKid)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2006, 5:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/6 "2006-01-23T17:07:35Z")

</div>

> [@Carnut](#):
>
> I would not recommend that at all.
> 
> I would recommend the Zeitronixs or the LM1 not the LC1 as that was crap.
> 
> If you need one PM me I can get you a good deal on one 🙂

i was going to add that … but i got distracted by titties on webcam …

with the lc1 coming in at 210, and the zeitronixs unit @ $270, the lc1 isnt worth it

the lc-1 seams to have to many problems, it should only be used when you have an ecu that will do rpm logging

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![focusinprogress](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/focusinprogress/32/7227_2.png) [@focusinprogress](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/focusinprogress)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2006, 5:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/7 "2006-01-23T17:32:30Z")

</div>

well, in my case, i have a program that datalogs everything already, and i can wire in the WB02 sensor as an analog so it records right along side of the rest of my info. where may i find the zietronix unit at that price of which you speak of? and does it have the analog output that mocks narrowband? thats the real reason i wanted to get the lc-1

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HotRodKid](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hotrodkid/32/7609_2.png) [@HotRodKid](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HotRodKid)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2006, 5:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/8 "2006-01-23T17:39:00Z")

</div>

you might be right that the zeitronixs analog out is NOT adjustable … fuck …

that leaves the LM-1 or other makes of wbo2’s

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zer0DazE](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/zer0daze/32/7624_2.png) [@Zer0DazE](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zer0DazE)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2006, 5:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wideband-suggestions/6809/9 "2006-01-24T05:10:46Z")

</div>

they fixed the problems with the lc-1, but as an all in one solution to datalogging its a horrible choice.
