# Win ME vs Win XP **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [October 11, 2006, 9:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737 "2006-10-11T09:25:28Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![FightinMike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7bcc69/32.png) [@FightinMike](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/FightinMike)\ **Post date:** [October 11, 2006, 11:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737/21 "2006-10-11T11:36:43Z")
Masturbating with sandpaper \> ME ---
**Author:** ![RuBiCaNT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rubicant/32/7622_2.png) [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)\ **Post date:** [October 11, 2006, 11:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737/22 "2006-10-11T11:51:17Z")
I acutally enjoyed ME because of it’s newer driver database. I didn’t have any problems with it. ---
**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\ **Post date:** [October 11, 2006, 11:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737/23 "2006-10-11T11:58:45Z")
> [@FightinMike](#): > > Masturbating with sandpaper \> ME :lol: ---
**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\ **Post date:** [October 11, 2006, 12:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737/24 "2006-10-11T12:12:09Z")
> [@RuBiCaNT](#): > > I acutally enjoyed ME because of it’s newer driver database. I didn’t have any problems with it. I was afraid to post it, but I felt the same way. I had a ME machine when I was in school. Worked great for mild gaming, word processing, and running VB6. Plus ME could boot in about 15-20 seconds if you optimized your system. But to say ME \> XP is nuts. > [@FormulaLS1](#): > > turbo lexus \> ME > > NOT! So wrong, but I lol’d. ---
**Author:** ![Rx3](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rx3/32/7194_2.png) [@Rx3](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Rx3)\ **Post date:** [October 11, 2006, 1:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737/25 "2006-10-11T13:36:21Z")
> [@RuBiCaNT](#): > > I acutally enjoyed ME because of it’s newer driver database. I didn’t have any problems with it. +1 ---
**Author:** ![Daddie](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/daddie/32/7621_2.png) [@Daddie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Daddie)\ **Post date:** [October 11, 2006, 4:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737/26 "2006-10-11T16:16:51Z")
you found drivers for shit for ME? lol ---
**Author:** ![RuBiCaNT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rubicant/32/7622_2.png) [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)\ **Post date:** [October 11, 2006, 4:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737/27 "2006-10-11T16:49:46Z")
> [@Daddie](#): > > you found drivers for shit for ME? lol 3com 905c network adapter to be exact. Windows 98 SE didn’t have them natively, WinMe did. WinME also booted faster than 98. ---
**Author:** ![ILCisDEAD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/a87d85/32.png) [@ILCisDEAD](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ILCisDEAD)\ **Post date:** [October 11, 2006, 9:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737/28 "2006-10-11T21:19:02Z")
> [@Daddie](#): > > lol, are you on crack… > > Win 98SE \> ME > > Win 95 \> ME ME is similar to 98 and 95… they are all loosely based off the same code… 2000 and above was off the windows NT yes ME wasn’t compatible with shit… but 98 and 95 sucked too… [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/win-me-vs-win-xp/18737.md?page=1)