# wow - no not world of warcraft gold

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wow-no-not-world-of-warcraft-gold/118055>\
**Category:** SON240sx Off Topic\
**Created:** [August 28, 2008, 11:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wow-no-not-world-of-warcraft-gold/118055 "2008-08-28T11:12:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![big-byrd](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/big-byrd/32/3192_2.png) [@big-byrd](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/big-byrd)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2008, 2:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wow-no-not-world-of-warcraft-gold/118055/10 "2008-08-28T14:44:38Z")

</div>

> [@Exactly how strong is a bunker buster? vid](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/exactly-how-strong-is-a-bunker-buster-vid/18157/6):
>
> Hey Gonad, how do you like FF3? I haven’t upgraded yet, mostly because I’m lazy… Any major improvements?

yep.

smaller memory footprint, as well as javascript optimizations. for FF 3.1, i believe their goal is to make JS speed comparable to native code using a JIT compiler.

[http://blog.pavlov.net/2008/03/11/firefox-3-memory-usage/](http://blog.pavlov.net/2008/03/11/firefox-3-memory-usage/)

> **[Firefox to get massive JavaScript performance boost](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2008/08/firefox-to-get-massive-javascript-performance-boost/)**
>
> Mozilla has adopted an innovative new optimization technique for the Firefox …

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wow-no-not-world-of-warcraft-gold/118055)._