# You Tube video used in arrest of motorcycle stunt rider

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [May 8, 2010, 12:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003 "2010-05-08T12:31:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mafdark](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mafdark/32/6322_2.png) [@Mafdark](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mafdark)\
**Post date:** [May 9, 2010, 10:11am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003/18 "2010-05-09T10:11:12Z")

</div>

> [@I have $5.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-have-5/31768/34):
>
> Because he wasnt actually cought by the police in the act… I have a Criminal Justice Degree and I have done a lot of case study’s in order to obtain my degree… The power of technology is also crazy… he could have done that in a controlled area a stunt show for instance and it could have been edited. I have been to air strips and rented areas where doing this type of thing is perfectly legal…
> 
> There is too many possibilities and i dont think this will hold in court. It has to be proof beyond a resonable doubt…

Is your argument that the US constitution states that criminals must be caught in the act by a police officer?

I don’t see the constitutional link anywhere in your statement.

edit, there is not legal standard for “reasonable doubt” but rather a “burden of proof” which requires the prosecution to prove that the particular person committed the crime.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003)._