# You Tube video used in arrest of motorcycle stunt rider

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [May 8, 2010, 12:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003 "2010-05-08T12:31:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![1BIGMOFO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/1/d9b06d/32.png) [@1BIGMOFO](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/1BIGMOFO)\
**Post date:** [May 9, 2010, 10:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003/19 "2010-05-09T10:13:46Z")

</div>

> [@Well i think we have a winner finally!! \*NO 56K\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/well-i-think-we-have-a-winner-finally-no-56k/31778/18):
>
> Is your argument that the US constitution states that criminals must be caught in the act by a police officer?
> 
> I don’t see the constitutional link anywhere in your statement.

no, i know it dosent say that in the actual constitution however there has to be proof beyond a resonable doubt… in my opinion there is not proof beyond a resonable doubt in this specific case. I was just offering my opinion…

There is loop holes in everything…please excuse my poor choice of wording…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003)._
