# You Tube video used in arrest of motorcycle stunt rider

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [May 8, 2010, 12:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003 "2010-05-08T12:31:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jeremiah](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jeremiah/32/6318_2.png) [@Jeremiah](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jeremiah)\
**Post date:** [May 9, 2010, 4:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003/22 "2010-05-09T16:58:52Z")

</div>

> [@custom third gen enclosure for sale](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/custom-third-gen-enclosure-for-sale/31772/5):
>
> no, i know it dosent say that in the actual constitution however there has to be proof beyond a resonable doubt… **in my opinion there is not proof beyond a resonable doubt in this specific case**. I was just offering my opinion…
> 
> There is loop holes in everything…please excuse my poor choice of wording…

There’s the problem. What do you know about this case other that just saying something like “It **could of** been and air strip” or “It **could of** been a stunt show”. You don’t hear stories of cops arresting guys for wreckless driving/speeding after a **legal** track day. Seems like all the loop holes belong to you.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/you-tube-video-used-in-arrest-of-motorcycle-stunt-rider/252003)._