# Your Health and LIFE May be at Risk for Sake of being PC

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/your-health-and-life-may-be-at-risk-for-sake-of-being-pc/42759>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [February 1, 2008, 4:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/your-health-and-life-may-be-at-risk-for-sake-of-being-pc/42759 "2008-02-01T04:48:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 130

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eclipsed](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/bbce88/32.png) [@eclipsed](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/eclipsed)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2008, 7:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/your-health-and-life-may-be-at-risk-for-sake-of-being-pc/42759/130 "2008-02-05T07:21:47Z")

</div>

> [@ILCisDEAD](#):
>
> Its across the board yes…
> 
> I will find you a link to it… Unfortunately whats coming up right now is a bunch of catholic sites… Which are well cited. I just not have been able to look into the cites to see if they are credible sources. I am also friends with quite a few gay males, and it is rather evident that they are awfully promiscuous. Where a clique of gay males have all slept with each other. there is 7 or 8 in the group. As well as others who don’t like to have a relationship with other males but like to fuck them.
> 
> Of maybe 15 - 20 gay males that I know I know of 5 that are not considered to be promiscuous. Again I’m not saying that all are promiscuous but through experience this is what I have seen. Which could be completely wrong.
> 
> Generally people engaging anal sex are far less common to use condoms. Yes, there are has been incredible leaps and bounds in terms of market safe sex. Thats (that I know of) has only been in the last 5 years.
> 
> There are also countless articles about gay/ bi males being at a higher risk of STD’s
> 
> Care to respond?

your group of 7-8 gay friends is not enough of a sample to provide any persuasive edivence of rampant promiscuity in the gay community. if there are other sites that statistically and scientifically prove it, within a reasonable assurance level, then i will stand corrected.

as far as the whole condom issue, the first word in your statement, “generally”, sums it up. your statement is just that, a generalization that you have no data to back up.

you do think about it rationally, i just don’t happen to agree with you. :tup:

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/your-health-and-life-may-be-at-risk-for-sake-of-being-pc/42759)._