You sir, have caught me! Happy now?
Deleting this thread is probably a good idea.
I’d look up a lawyer just in case the police do show up, but if he started the fight, brought a weapon, then got his ass kicked, he’d be an idiot to call the police. “Hi, 911, I started a fight and got my ass whooped, can you go arrest the guy?”
hope there was a witness, otherwise, you attacked him with a bat.
if he brought a bat, you are not allowed to use a gun lol
this
Wrong actually, look up the law. Article 35 NY Penal Law - Defense of Justification | NY Laws
S 35.15 Justification; use of physical force in defense of a person.
- A person may, subject to the provisions of subdivision two, use
physical force upon another person when and to the extent he reasonably
believes such to be necessary to defend himself or a third person from
what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful
physical force by such other person, unless:
(a) The latter`s conduct was provoked by the actor himself with intent
to cause physical injury to another person; or
(b) The actor was the initial aggressor; except that in such case his
use of physical force is nevertheless justifiable if he has withdrawn
from the encounter and effectively communicated such withdrawal to such
other person but the latter persists in continuing the incident by the
use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force; or
(c) The physical force involved is he product of a combat by
agreement not specifically authorized by law.- A person may not use deadly physical force upon another person
under circumstances specified in subdivision one unless:
(a) He reasonably believes that such other person is using or about to
use deadly physical force. Even in such case, however, the actor may not
use deadly physical force if he knows that he can with complete safety
as to himself and others avoid the necessity of so doing by retreating;
except that he is under no duty to retreat if he is:
(i) in his dwelling and not the initial aggressor; or
(ii) a police officer or peace officer or a person assisting a police
officer or a peace officer at the latter`s direction, acting pursuant to
section 35.30; or
(b) He reasonably believes that such other person is committing or
attempting to commit a kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible sodomy or
robbery; or
(c) He reasonably believes that such other person is committing or
attempting to commit a burglary, and the circumstances are such that the
use of deadly physical force is authorized by subdivision three of
section 35.20.
A bat or knife is very much ‘deadly physical force’.
According to this, im leaning towards you being guilty.
i guarantee i would be able to stop someone who has a bat, i cannot stop someone who has a gun. Shooting the gun should be last resort
story time
Nigga that’s 5-10
Certain individuals always have something to say about me.I have noticied that its always mentioned that i write in broken english, well its because i do not like writting so proper on here for the simple fact is, that if i write in short words the words i write are still understandable.so i did graduate with a high school diploma and did pass english with all high grades… Now hop off
Lawyer up, and make sure you get a good one. Never speak to anyone about it without the lawyer present.
Anything you say on here about the case can be used against you, so best to keep your yap shut.
S 35.15 Justification; use of physical force in defense of a person.
- A person may, subject to the provisions of subdivision two, use
physical force upon another person when and to the extent he reasonably
believes such to be necessary to defend himself or a third person from
what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful
physical force by such other person, unless:
(a) The latter`s conduct was provoked by the actor himself with intent
to cause physical injury to another person; or
(b) The actor was the initial aggressor; except that in such case his
use of physical force is nevertheless justifiable if he has withdrawn
from the encounter and effectively communicated such withdrawal to such
other person but the latter persists in continuing the incident by the
use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force; or
© The physical force involved is he product of a combat by
agreement not specifically authorized by law. - A person may not use deadly physical force upon another person
under circumstances specified in subdivision one unless:
(a) He reasonably believes that such other person is using or about to
use deadly physical force. Even in such case, however, the actor may not
use deadly physical force if he knows that he can with complete safety
as to himself and others avoid the necessity of so doing by retreating;
except that he is under no duty to retreat if he is:
(i) in his dwelling and not the initial aggressor; or
(ii) a police officer or peace officer or a person assisting a police
officer or a peace officer at the latter`s direction, acting pursuant to
section 35.30; or
(b) He reasonably believes that such other person is committing or
attempting to commit a kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible sodomy or
robbery; or
© He reasonably believes that such other person is committing or
attempting to commit a burglary, and the circumstances are such that the
use of deadly physical force is authorized by subdivision three of
section 35.20.
“I honestly thought he was going to rape me.”
^ lol winning defense
moderator delete thread
LoL
Lol, dear nyspeed lawyers can you un fuck me please?
Posted from tapatalk