Epic race cars

Feel free to add your own favorite. Only one car per post, description and race history required

M3 GTR

An E46 GTR came to life on February 2001, powered by the P60B40 a 3,997 cc V8 producing 444 bhp (331 kW; 450 PS) (race version—street version produced 380 bhp (283 kW; 385 PS)). Unlike the straight-six powered M3 versions, which were outpaced by the Porsche 996 GT3, the racing version of the E46 M3 GTR 16 was very successful in the American Le Mans Series (ALMS), entered by Schnitzer Motorsport. Rivals such as Porsche pointed out that this car was more of a prototype as no V8 engine was available in the road-going BMW E46, which is in violation of the spirit of Gran Turismo. In 2001, ALMS regulations stated that cars must be for sale on two continents within twelve months of the rules being issued. To fulfill this rule, BMW put 10 road going GTRs on sale after the 2001 season, for 250,000 euros (then $218,000) each, allegedly only available for select customers.

Due to this, the ALMS rules were altered for 2002 to state that 100 cars and 1000 engines must be built for the car to qualify without penalties. Although BMW could have raced the V8 with the new weight and power penalties under these new regulations, they chose to pull out of the ALMS, effectively ending the short-lived M3 GTR’s career.

Two Schnitzer Motorsport GTR cars saw a comeback in 2003 at the 24 Hours Nürburgring, winning 1-2 in 2004 and 2005, as well as entries in the 24 Hours Spa. Onboard coverage recorded in 2004 Hans-Joachim Stuck, Pedro Lamy, Jörg Müller & Dirk Müller on the Nürburgring and Spa-Francorchamps.

Private teams (Scheid, Getrag, etc.) also have fit 3,997 cc BMW V8 engines into the E46 body to race on the Nürburgring, winning some VLN races in the last years.

The Mazda 787 and its derivative 787B were Group C sports prototype racing cars built by Mazda for use in the World Sportscar Championship, All Japan Sports Prototype Championship, as well as the 24 Hours of Le Mans from 1990 to 1991. Designed to combine a mixture of the Fédération Internationale du Sport Automobile (FISA) Group C regulations with the International Motor Sports Association (IMSA) GTP regulations, the 787s were the last Wankel rotary-powered racing cars to compete in the World and Japanese championships, using Mazda’s R26B engine.

Although the 787 and 787B lacked the single lap pace of World Championship competitors such as Mercedes-Benz, Jaguar, and Porsche, as well Japanese Championship competitors Nissan and Toyota, the Mazdas had reliability which allowed them to contend for their respective championships. The reliability of the cars eventually paid off in 1991 when a 787B driven by Johnny Herbert, Volker Weidler, and Bertrand Gachot went on to victory in the 1991 24 Hours of Le Mans. This remains as of 2009[update] the only victory by a Japanese marque as well as the only victory by a car not using a reciprocating engine design.

A total of two 787s were constructed in 1990, while three newer specification 787Bs were built in 1991.

Following the 1990 season, Mazda continued development of the 787 chassis in order to make improvements on its pace and reliability. One major development was the intake system for the rotaries. In the past, Mazda had developed variable length telescopic intake runners to optimize engine power and torque for varying rpms. For 1991, the system became continuously variable, rather than previous versions that had steps for different engine ranges. The 787B’s onboard ECU controlled the action of the telescopic intake.

Three new 787Bs were built for 1991, while the two existing 787s were also upgraded with the new intakes.

General specifications
Country of origin Japan
Chassis number 787B - 002
Numbers built 3
Produced in 1991

Major wins
1991 24 Hours of Le Mans (Bertrand Cachot / Johnny Herbert / Volker Weidler)

Engine
Configuration R26B R 4
Location Mid, longitudinally mounted
Displacement 2.616 liter / 159.6 cu in
Fuel feed Electronic Fuel Injection
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated

Drivetrain
Chassis/body carbon fibre monocoque
Suspension (fr/r) double wishbones, inboard coil springs over shock absorbers, anti-roll bar
Steering rack-and-pinion
Brakes Rays Volk discs, all-round
Gearbox Mazda-Porsche 5 speed Manual
Drive Rear wheel drive

Dimensions
Weight 830 kilo / 1829.8 lbs
Length / Width / Height 4782 mm (188.3 in) / 1994 mm (78.5 in) / 1003 mm (39.5 in)
Wheelbase / Track (fr/r) 2660 mm (104.7 in) / 1534 mm (60.4 in) / 1504 mm (59.2 in)

Performance figures
Power 700 bhp / 522 KW @ 9000 rpm
Torque 608 Nm / 448 ft lbs @ 6500 rpm
BHP/Liter 268 bhp / liter
Power to weight 0.84 bhp / kg

nm

mmmmmmmmm r26b

que?

Yes!

Based on the Aston Martin DB9 road car, the DBR9 retains the chassis, and the engine block and cylinder heads of the road car’s V12 engine. The rest of the car is re-engineered for high performance competition use. The DBR9’s bodywork is a blend of optimum aerodynamic performance and the styling of the DB9 road car. All the body panels are constructed from carbon fibre composite (except the roof) to minimize the weight of the car. To complete the aerodynamic body, the bottom of the car is flat all the way from the front to the rear diffuser. To optimise rear downforce a carbon fibre wing has been added. The car goes from 0-60 mph in 3.4 seconds.
For the 2007 24 Hours of Le Mans, Prodrive made modifications to the DBR9 design in order to not only improve performance, but also to increase driver comfort in the cockpit. Due to new regulations put into place by Le Mans organizers, the DBR9 required the installation of an air conditioning unit in order to prevent overstressing drivers. Prodrive went further by putting a heat-resistant white roof on all new cars to assist in keeping cockpit temperatures down. Performance modifications included the removal of two cooling vents from the bonnet of the car due to no longer being necessary.

http://albums.rate.ee/s3/0/2/a/02aa3541258.jpg

The Toyota GT-One

Following the end of the Group C era around 1994, Toyota decided to alter its plans in sports car racing by moving to the production-based GT classes for 1995. Toyota decided to approach this in two ways by using two different styles of car for competition. The first was a heavily modified Toyota Supra, referred to as the Supra LM, which would use a turbocharged inline-4. The second entry was a custom built car designed specifically to be a racing car, yet required a small number of production cars for sale in order to meet homologation regulations. This car was modified heavily from the Toyota MR2, and became known as the SARD MC8-R. The MC8-R would use a custom built Toyota turbocharged V8. While the Supra performed admirably in 1995, the MC8-R would appear superior for 1996. With development of high powered supercars for the GT classes at the time, Toyota decided that a car similar to the MC8-R, which was intended as a race car first, would be better suited to continuing Toyota’s development of a GT car. Thus Toyota announced they would skip the 1997 24 Hours of Le Mans to be able to develop their new GT car for 1998.

Turning to Toyota’s European arm based in Cologne, Germany, Toyota Team Europe (TTE) was charged with development of the new GT car. With taking the one-year hiatus, TTE was able to look at what the competition was developing for the GT class, and exploit it to their benefit. In 1997, both the Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR and the Porsche 911 GT1 were dominant cars in their class that exploited loop holes in the rules in place at the time. Each car was a custom built super car of which only a small handful of production cars were built to homologate it. TTE realized that they would actually only need to build a single production car in order to meet homologation regulations, thus allowing TTE to have a car that would never truly be sold to a customer, meaning that any driver luxuries could be left out.
Second, Toyota learned about a loophole which Mercedes-Benz had exploited. All GT based cars were required to have storage space, capable of holding a standard sized suitcase, in order for the car to be considered not only production based, but usable by the public. Mercedes exploited this by putting a small cubby hole into an unused area underneath the rear bodywork, although it was not as easy to access as a normal trunk. Toyota, in their interpretation of the rules, were able to convince Automobile Club de l’Ouest (ACO) officials that the car’s fuel tank, normally empty when the car is scrutineered before the race, was allowable as a trunk space since it could, theoretically, hold a suitcase.

With these loopholes in place, TTE was able to set out in laying-out the GT-One. TTE designed and manufactured the car’s carbon fiber chassis and bodywork in-house, while Toyota supplied an upgraded version of the engine they originally used on their Group C cars, the R36V 3.6 L Turbo V8.
TTE also developed the only two GT-One road cars built, required in order for the race car to qualify as a road car-based Grand Tourer. They were painted red and fitted with a basic interior. One was put into a museum in Japan.

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_2l0rVeUht5w/SFe8V0EQfZI/AAAAAAAAAXM/KIj8sXIpkOM/PICT09623a.jpg

The Sauber C9

The Sauber C9 (later named the Mercedes-Benz C9 or Sauber Mercedes C9) was a Group C prototype race car introduced in 1987 as a continuation of the partnership between Sauber as a constructor and Mercedes-Benz as an engine builder for the World Sportscar Championship. The C9 replaced the previous Sauber C8. For its debut season in 1987, the cars were run by Kouros Racing, named after the fragrance brand of its sponsor, Yves Saint Laurent , although officially backed by Mercedes-Benz. The team managed a mere twelfth in the teams standings, scoring points in only a single round. For 1988, Kouros was dropped as a sponsor, forcing the team to be renamed Sauber Mercedes. As a result, Mercedes used AEG-Olympia for sponsor - AEG being owned by Daimler-Benz at the time. They managed to finish second in the championship behind Silk Cut Jaguar with five wins for the season. Unfortunately at the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the team suffered an embarrassing setback when they were forced to withdraw due to concern over their Michelin tires.

Finally, in 1989, the car was able to achieve great success. Beside replacing the black color scheme for its national plain silver scheme, reducing AEG as a minor sponsor, the older M117 5.0L turbocharged V8 engine was upgraded to the M119, which replaced steel heads with new aluminium. The C9 was able to win all but one race in the 1989 season, including the 24 Hours of Le Mans. During qualifying for Le Mans, the C9 recorded a speed of 247mph (398km/h) on the Mulsanne Straight, a record. Mercedes driver Jean-Louis Schlesser would end up taking the driver’s championship that season.
The C9 would be replaced by the Mercedes-Benz C11 for 1990.

The Toyota 7 (578A)

The Toyota 7 was a racing car developed by Toyota Motor Company and subsidiary Yamaha Motor Corporation. Designed primarily for use in the Japanese Grand Prix, the cars were Toyota’s first custom-built racing car, competing under the FIA’s Group 7 rules, similar to the Can Am series in North America and Interserie in Europe.

The 7, known by the internal code 415S was developed by Jiro Kawano, who had also developed the 2000GT that Toyota had previously entered in the Japanese Grand Prix. Yamaha constructed the chassis while the new 5.0 litre V8 engine was built by Toyota. The V8 that powered the 7 replaced the Straight-6 engine used in the 2000GT due to the increase power potential of the larger engine. This engine was capable of producing up to 300 hp, thanks to the addition of a dual overhead cam design. However, the 3.0 litre V8 which was used in the early years was not powerful enough to compete with the Chevrolet and Porsche-powered competitors. This led to the development of a 5.0 litre version, capable of 600 hp. The initial bodywork was similar to other Group 7 cars, with an open two-seater cockpit and large intakes behind the doors. Exhaust pipes were placed directly on top of the engine, exiting straight off the tail of the car. A simple rollhoop protected the driver.

The 7s made their debut at the 1968 Japanese Grand Prix, four entries starting and two of those finishing, taking eighth and ninth places. Although the 7s finished, they were well behind their main competitor, Nissan, who had not only two new R381s, but also three older R380-IIs finish in the top six. Porsche also managed to finish ahead of Toyota with their 906. Toyota entered the 7s in several other Japanese events that year, including the 1000 km Suzuka, where the cars took the top four positions. A 200-mile (320 km) event was held at Fuji against invited contenders from the Can Am series, with five 7s entered; the Toyotas finished fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and ninth.

For 1969, the 7s were evolved in order to adapt to problems on the original cars. The bodywork was completely redesigned, shaped similar to a large broad wedge for increased front downforce. For the rear of the car, the exhaust pipes were placed within the bodywork, while an intake scoop was mounted over the rollbar. These new 7s were referred to internally as the 474S, while press material referred to it as the New 7. The revised New 7s continued to show their potential, winning the 1000 km Suzuka once again. For the New 7s main event, the Japanese Grand Prix, Nissan arrived with their revised R382s. Although Toyota was able to outperform Porsche, including a factory-run squad in a new 917, the Nissans once again proved too daunting, taking the top two spots by a lap over the Toyota.

Toyota made plans to revise the car once again for 1970, most notably by the addition of two turbochargers to the V8 engine. These additions boosted power to 800 hp. A large rear wing was also added to the 7, helping to increase rear downforce and traction. This car was known by the name 578A.
However, the Japanese Automobile Federation (JAF) announced that the Japanese Grand Prix was to be revised for use by open wheel cars from 1970 on. This forced Toyota to cancel the 7 program, although at least one turbocharged 7 had been completed prior to the announcement.
Toyota planned to move the cars to North America and enter Can-Am, however drivers Sachio Fukuzawa[8] and Minoru Kawai were killed in separate testing accidents in February 1969 and August 1970. Sachio was in fact testing the only coupé version of the car that was especially built when he fatally crashed. This would be the last sports prototype built by Toyota until the 1980s.

Toyota used the 7 once more in 1970 as a base for the EX-7, publicly shown at that year’s Tokyo Motor Show. The turbochargers were removed from the V8 engine to bring the power down to 450 PS (330 kW) while the bodywork was a streamlined coupe design similar to other supercars of the era.

“The absolute star of the DTM 155 was the drivetrain, which combined a high revving V6 engine with the newly developed Q4 four-wheel drive system. Displacing just 2.5 litre, the all alloy, Naturally Aspirated engine produced a staggering 400 bhp at 11500 rpm. That was as much as the SuperTurismo raced in 1992 and that had Turbocharged engine. The engine was mounted ahead of the front axle and the six-speed gearbox was fitted separately in the middle of the car for better weight balance. About a third of the power was sent to the front wheels with rest going to the rear.”

source: excerpts taken from ultimatecarpage

By far my fav:
http://www.autoevolution.com/images/news/gallery/medium/group-b-rally-cars-the-killer-b-s-medium_8.jpg

Seen Here:


And here:

The Audi Sport Quattro S1 was introduced at the end of 1984 as an update to the Audi Sport Quattro. The car featured a inline 5-cylinder engine that displaced 2,110 cc (128.8 cu in) and produced an officially quoted figure of 350 kW (480 PS; 470 bhp).[1] However, the turbocharger utilised a recirculating air system, with the aim of keeping the turbo spinning at high rpm, when the driver closed the throttle, either to back off during cornering, or on gearshifts. This allowed the engine to resume full power immediately after the resumption of full throttle, reducing turbo lag. The actual power figure was in excess of 500 bhp (373 kW; 507 PS) at 8000 rpm.
In addition to the improved power output, an aggressive aerodynamic kit was added that featured very distinctive wings and spoilers to the front and rear of the car to increase downforce. The weight was lightened to just 1,090 kg (2,403 lb), and now accelerate from 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in just 3.1 seconds. Some of the cars were supplied with a “power-shift gearbox”, which is said to be a forerunner of today’s Direct-Shift Gearbox (DSG) technology.

The S1 proved to be an immediate success in the rally circuit, helping Walter Röhrl and Christian Geistdörfer win the 1985 San Remo Rally. A modified version of the S1, was also driven by Michèle Mouton The S1 evolution would become the final Group B car produced by Audi, with the works team withdrawing from the Championship following the 1986 rally in Portugal.
Twenty years after the cancellation of Group B, the Sport Quattro S1 was still widely regarded as the most powerful rally car ever fielded in international competition, with the final factory machines of 1986 rated at an incredible 441 kW (600 PS; 591 bhp). In addition to Group B competition, the S1 won the 1985 Pikes Peak International Hill Climb with Michèle Mouton in the driving seat, setting a world record time in the process. This victory was repeated in 1987, this time at the hands of Walter Röhrl.

My favorite car of all time.

Toyota Eagle Mark III

http://www.sportscardigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/090908-2023-historictoy4.jpg

Campaigned from '91 to '93 it is one of the most successful GTP chassis in history and put up the competition necessary to knock the venerable Nissan’s off the podium. The car was ironically designed by Dan Gurney’s company, All American Racers.

Powered was provided by a 2.1 liter inline four, turbocharged at 2 bar of boost. Producing in full race trim over 700hp and putting it down through a then common March gearbox(five speed). The chassis was a carbon/nomex honeycomb monocoque with carbon kevlar body panels and tipping the scales at just over one ton, however at full force down the straights it’s aerodynamics generated over five tons of downforce. Iron brake discs were standard fitment although during some short track events the cars were fitted with prototype carbon disks.

The Bentley Speed 8 (developed from the Bentley EXP Speed 8) was a Le Mans Prototype race car that was designed by Peter Elleray, to win the 24 Hours of Le Mans. EXP Speed 8 debuted in 2001, the Speed 8 car finally winning in 2003. It has a strong resemblance to and shares some technology with the Audi R8C, which had raced only once before Audi dropped the project to focus on the later dominant Audi R8. The EXP Speed 8 marked Bentley’s return to racing after a 73-year absence.

http://members.fortunecity.com/freecarwallpapers/images/bentley_speed8_01.jpg


Only five McLaren F1 LM (LM for Le Mans) cars were built in honour of the five McLaren F1 GTRs which finished the 1995 24 Hours of Le Mans, including taking the overall win.[31]
The weight was reduced by approximately 75 kg (165 lb) over that of original, through the removal of various pieces of trim and use of optional equipment. The car also had a different transaxle, various aerodynamic modifications, specially-designed 18-inch (457 mm) magnesium alloy wheels and upgraded gearbox. The F1 LM used the same engine as the 1995 F1 GTR, however, without race-mandated restrictors to produce 680 hp (507 kW; 689 PS). It had a top speed of 225 mph (362 km/h), which is less than the standard version because of added aerodynamic drag, despite identical gear ratios. The LM is 76 kg (168 lb) lighter than the stock F1 – a total mass of 1,062 kg (2,341 lb) – achieved by having no interior noise suppression, no audio system, a very stripped-down base interior, no fan-assisted ground effect and no dynamic rear wing. In the place of the small dynamic rear wing there is a considerably larger, fixed CFRP rear wing mounted on the back of the vehicle.
The LM machine has the following performance figures: peak torque of 705.0 Nm (520.0 ft·lbf) at 4500 rpm and peak power of 680 PS (500 kW) at 7800 rpm, it has a redline at 8500 rpm. The total weight of 1,062 kg (2,341 lb) gives the car a 110.16 bhp (82 kW; 112 PS) per litre ratio.[32]
With a traction-limited 0-60 mph (97 km/h) time of 3.9 seconds and 0-100 mph (161 km/h) of 6.7 seconds, the LM accelerates very quickly indeed.[33] It was once the holder of the 0-100-0 mph record which it completed in 11.5 seconds when driven by Andy Wallace at the disused airbase RAF Alconbury in Cambridgeshire.[34][35]
The F1 LMs can be identified by their Papaya Orange paint. The F1 LMs were painted in this colour in memory and tribute to Bruce McLaren, whose race colour was Papaya Orange.
Although only five F1 LMs were sold, a sixth chassis exists in the form of XP1 LM, the prototype for modifications to the existing F1 to form the new F1 LM. This car is also painted Papaya Orange and is retained by McLaren. This car, reportedly worth $4 million, has been promised by McLaren CEO Ron Dennis to his driver Lewis Hamilton if he should win an additional two Formula One World Championship titles.[36]

http://www.solsticeforum.com/forum/attachments/f114/16086d1256991136-sports-coupes-ac-shelby-cobra-daytona-coupe_16.jpg
Five Shelby Daytona cars were constructed in Italy, one car, known to collectors as CSX2287, was manufactured in the United States. Ownership of the cars was recorded for five cars, however records for the sixth car were lost in the mid-1970s. For a long time car historians and collectors feared the sixth car was lost.
In 2001 the car was discovered in a rental storage unit in California. The owner Donna O’Hara had committed suicide by burning herself alive.[1] The car had remained undiscovered for about three decades. Due to its estimated worth of $4,000,000 the car was part of an extensive legal battle between her mother who sold the car to a collector in Pennsylvania, and a friend of Ms. O’Hara who was the recipient in her will of the contents of the storage unit. An earlier owner of the car appears to have been music producer Phil Spector who had been known to drive it on the streets of Los Angeles. Built for high-speed sprints, the cab became uncomfortably warm as the car engine heated up, among other problems. “It wasn’t a street car; it was a race car,” Shelby said. Still, Spector drove it on the streets, and legend is that Spector racked up so many speeding tickets, his lawyer advised him to get rid of the car before he lost his license.
The discovery of this car has been dubbed as the greatest find in the history of car collecting.
CSX2287 has been mechanically reconditioned and is on display at the Simeone Foundation Automotive Museum [1] in Philadelphia. Jay Leno has been to the museum and video of him driving the car appears on his Web site:


The factory never intended to race the F40, but the car saw competition as early as 1989 when it debuted in the Laguna Seca round of the IMSA, appearing in the GTO category, with a LM evolution model driven by Jean Alesi, finishing third to the two faster spaceframed four wheel drive Audi 90 and beating a host of other factory backed spaceframe specials that dominated the races. Despite lack of factory backing, the car would soon have another successful season there under a host of guest drivers such as Jean-Pierre Jabouille, Jacques Laffite and Hurley Haywood taking a total of three second places and one third.
Although the F40 would not return to IMSA for the following season, it would later be a popular choice by privateers to compete in numerous domestic GT series including JGTC. In 1994, the car made its debut in international competitions, with one cars campaigned in the BPR Global GT Series by Strandell, winning at the 4 Hours of Vallelunga. In 1995, the number of F40s climbed to four, developed independently by Pilot-Aldix Racing (F40 LM) and Strandell (F40 GTE, racing under the Ferrari Club Italia banner), winning the 4 Hours of Anderstorp. No longer competitive against the McLaren F1 GTR, the Ferrari F40 returned for another year in 1996, managing to repeat the previous year’s Anderstorp win, and from then on it was no longer seen in GT racing.

Expect nothing less from me than the Venerable Porsche 962/962C

http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd138/subzero9285/Porsche-962C_3.jpg

The 962 was Porsches answer to IMSA GTP rules changes for the '84 season. Prior to this, the 956 ran with good success although not without it’s flaws. '84 rules changes included the major safety contraints, in which the drivers must now be contained completely withing the monocoque cell of the chassis substructure.

Porsche took this rull change and set about modifying the 956 to suit, moving the front suspension forward some 120mm and pulling the drivers feet behind the axles centerline. To stay within the mandated body length, the 962 was fitted with a shorter nose section. This change in the aerodynamics created less of a “hunting” aero nose, but also less downforce. To counteract this Porsche modified the flat underbody of the car with a negative dimple between the drivers pedal box and the for bulkhead, essentially creating the required downforce.

Initially the 962 was powered by a 2.8L SOHC aircooled flat six, producing in the neighborhood of 650hp. This motor was force feed by a single KKK36 at 1.4-2.1 bar of boost pending race conditions. In the 85-86 season a well renowned Porsche tuner, Andial, would release a newer 3.2L single turbo engine. This motor is what began the 962’s reign and was eventually banned by IMSA as a non factory component due to complaints from other manufactures(mainly Nissan and Jaguar).

The 962C differed from the 962 based on it’s motor, and it was a drastic change indeed. The motors were 3-3.4L in displacement with twin KKK 27 turbochargers producing 1.4-2.2 bar of boost and pending race trim, 700-850hp. DOHC liquid cooled heads were welded to the aircooled cylinders to devoid any chance of a head gasket failure and the twin intercooler system was setup to reduce lag to a bare minimum. The result was a combination of power and handling second to none. The chassis took Championships in Lemans from '85-'87, and again in '94 when Dauer released their privateer car, Interseier from '87-'92, JSPC from '85-'89, WSC '85-'86, IMSA GT '85-'88, and Supercup from '86-'89. Add in all the continued sub wins up to '94 and the 962 shows how well of a chassis it really was back then.

As much as this is my absolute favorite car, it doesn’t fit the topic as it’s not an epic race car. The LM’s never raced, they were revised F1’s modified beyond GTR restrictions. Correct your post for Mclaren GTR chassis #01R :wink:

Me busting yer balls :wink: If you’d like me to do it for you, I have a very nice limited edition book from Mclaren cars LTd all about these cars I can pull infor from for you!

Yeah, go for it man. The F1 is one of my all time favorite cars, and the LM came to mind as more of a racecar than the street going version.