Here is Dr. Paul’s statement introducing the bill…
Madam Speaker, I rise to introduce the Federal Reserve Transparency Act. Throughout its nearly 100-year history, the Federal Reserve has presided over the near-complete destruction of the United States dollar. Since 1913 the dollar has lost over 95% of its purchasing power, aided and abetted by the Federal Reserve’s loose monetary policy. How long will we as a Congress stand idly by while hard-working Americans see their savings eaten away by inflation? Only big-spending politicians and politically favored bankers benefit from inflation.
Serious discussion of proposals to oversee the Federal Reserve is long overdue. I have been a longtime proponent of more effective oversight and auditing of the Fed, but I was far from the first Congressman to advocate these types of proposals. Esteemed former members of the Banking Committee such as Chairmen Wright Patman and Henry B. Gonzales were outspoken critics of the Fed and its lack of transparency.
Since its inception, the Federal Reserve has always operated in the shadows, without sufficient scrutiny or oversight of its operations. While the conventional excuse is that this is intended to reduce the Fed’s susceptibility to political pressures, the reality is that the Fed acts as a foil for the government. Whenever you question the Fed about the strength of the dollar, they will refer you to the Treasury, and vice versa. The Federal Reserve has, on the one hand, many of the privileges of government agencies, while retaining benefits of private organizations, such as being insulated from Freedom of Information Act requests.
The Federal Reserve can enter into agreements with foreign central banks and foreign governments, and the GAO is prohibited from auditing or even seeing these agreements. Why should a government-established agency, whose police force has federal law enforcement powers, and whose notes have legal tender status in this country, be allowed to enter into agreements with foreign powers and foreign banking institutions with no oversight? Particularly when hundreds of billions of dollars of currency swaps have been announced and implemented, the Fed’s negotiations with the European Central Bank, the Bank of International Settlements, and other institutions should face increased scrutiny, most especially because of their significant effect on foreign policy. If the State Department were able to do this, it would be characterized as a rogue agency and brought to heel, and if a private individual did this he might face prosecution under the Logan Act, yet the Fed avoids both fates.
More importantly, the Fed’s funding facilities and its agreements with the Treasury should be reviewed. The Treasury’s supplementary financing accounts that fund Fed facilities allow the Treasury to funnel money to Wall Street without GAO or Congressional oversight. Additional funding facilities, such as the Primary Dealer Credit Facility and the Term Securities Lending Facility, allow the Fed to keep financial asset prices artificially inflated and subsidize poorly performing financial firms.
The Federal Reserve Transparency Act would eliminate restrictions on GAO audits of the Federal Reserve and open Fed operations to enhanced scrutiny. We hear officials constantly lauding the benefits of transparency and especially bemoaning the opacity of the Fed, its monetary policy, and its funding facilities. By opening all Fed operations to a GAO audit and calling for such an audit to be completed by the end of 2010, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act would achieve much-needed transparency of the Federal Reserve. I urge my colleagues to support this bill.
It seems that Dr. Paul misunderstands the goal of the central banking system as it sits. FRB is not under the authority of congress or president with regards to its day to day operations.
All he wants to do is to get rid of FRB, and this bill well serve no goals but to undermine its authority.
FRB finances itself. It doesn’t need congress’ money. If FRB was controlled by the whims of congress - banks won’t trust it so there woldn’t be a point to it at all. Which is exactly what Ron Paul wants. FRB is meant to be independent - that’s why the governors serve staggered 14 year terms.
So if congress has no direct control over what they’re doing - what’s the point of an audit?
So in summary - the system is working as intended. Ron Paul opposes the whole idea, but has no support to get rid of the FRB entirely, so instead he is trying to undermine it with thousand duck bites.
Yeah, it makes no sense for congress to AUDIT the organization that controls the nations money supply when they are the ones suppose to be watching over it.
I know how it works and what Ron Paul wants from it, but even if you don’t agree with him I don’t see how a sane person can be against an audit.
The “problem” with the monetary policy is that there are very few people who actually understand what is going on, how the instruments at central bank’s disposal interact with each other and the world. One can even argue that none REALY does (And Ron Paul does argue that). So it is unclear how the congress can even comprehend the issues, let alone make a positive impact.
Monetary policy is full of mind numbing articles like this, and crazy geniuses like this this
Sane person can argue against additional audits if the incremental cost of and audit far outweighs the benefit additional information. and also if additional audits would defeat the purpose of the entire system.
It should be noted that they do, in general, provide operations reports to congress. And they are audited quite extensively by GAO. You can read a report on what they report and don’t here: http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat5/150187.pdf, it also describes the drawbacks of additional audits.
They are also audited by independent accounting teams, like PWC at least annually. To do more extensive audit would consume an absurd amount of additional money - considering there is no evidence of significant issues with the program.
