Automotive Photography Thread.








http://farm1.static.flickr.com/206/513049802_5beebaede3_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2448/3577460888_7e54440626.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3254/2762516724_07d37a1e24.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3296/2706885605_739130e828.jpg



http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2385/1802186515_9e688db918.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2493/3850471999_2b4311d600.jpg

Oh hey guyz, just checking in for a quick dump.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdobbins/3769261599/

You guys do know that “Automotive Photography” isn’t just shots of full cars…


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3489/3991450794_34ab88c4bf.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2590/4013007524_6d087dca1c.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2571/3966228226_7f645ba85a.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2486/3943680580_a2a9b92231.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2535/3942722695_37edb98a4f.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2453/3866618180_da708c5512.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2752/4048867043_764845306d_b.jpg

Fantastic thread!

:bowdown

Dude, then wtf is this pic:

That had NOTHING said about it, and looks like a 1980 throw away camera. Seriously people need to get off my fucking back for posts. Shits stupid. :Idiots

Where was that posted? That’s probably ONE picture in here that’s sub-par other than your pics you posted. Your’s honestly looked like they were just point&shoot quick shots.

Really you can’t tell a difference between posts like this




And yours

Really?

Was posted on the 1st page. And thats YOUR opinion, I think that they look alot better than a point and shoot, keep in mind they are hosted on photobucket as well…

Yeah, I can tell its HDR’d/PS’d to all hell. If you want a HDR thread state that its a HDR thread…


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2422/4045649222_d6ebfa9d46_b.jpg





http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2704/4033163267_6ab4e79aee_o.jpg

Check the rest of the thread, less than 10% of all posts are HDR.

It’s not just MY opinion, it’s the opinion of the majority here, those pictures are sub par and the first one I could do with a point and shoot. NO SKILL or planning was involved in that shot other than “hey I’ll wash an park on the garage”.

Sorry but no.

It’s not MY opinion, you can clearly tell the difference between a high quality picture and a non-high quality picture. The photobucket thing is a rumor that I don’t believe because a bunch of my pictures posted in here are on photobucket and even so, it may affect the grain if anything.

two of the 4 pictures Vlad just used are HDR’d, the others are not.

How does this:

take ANY more skill than this:

http://i290.photobucket.com/albums/ll257/Allgo5oh/SonicCobra3.jpg?t=1259719771

??

You know what, fuck it, just delete the posts if it aggitates you guys THAT much…

adam keep postin brudda, stangs lookin guud

For starters, by not being this

See what I did there :ponder

I’m not telling you not to post, just be more selective in your posts that is all.

There are plenty of very nice pictures of Mustangs.

HDR, wide angle, rolling, using lighting etc.

Point and shoot up close ones, should be a no go in the sea of others :banghead.

So everything has to be wide view??? Just making sure before I post again so no one gets upset.

Vlad posted a mustang, def subscribed to this thread.

No, but it takes skill, planning, equipment and editing to take a good upclose shot. More so than just walk up and *click.

I wish Killabird chimed in here!



Quickworks ^

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3399/3172246943_21baf3d523.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3609/3279437463_373ab87dd7_b.jpg



http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/4006414233_bfe52a4714_b.jpg

http://eb-photo.net/rattle/focusingscreen.jpg

^^^ Such a tight picture!!!

http://eb-photo.net/rattle/forums/evanfront2.jpg




http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2590/4006580384_cee4dd7f05_b.jpg

CLICK

http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/5218/img41983.jpg

Click what? I posted that on the first page brah.