For Marcus

[RuBiCaNT]

@'[Cyanide

;742324’]It’s 13.5% slower than the Q6600, but it’s also 13.5% cheaper. So it works out

Plus those benchmarks were at stock speeds, they didn’t show any benchmarks where they were able to overclock it to 3.0Ghz.

Oh and Tom’s Hardware was able to get it to overclock to 3.0Ghz no problem.

What is going to have more overclocking headroom, a crappy processed 65nm CPU (AMD) or a well processed 45nm CPU (Intel)? It’s really a no-brainer.