OFFICIAL: 2008 ELECTION THREAD

Yes, it’s true, you found me out, I am secretly the leader of the McCain bandwagon.:lol:

x2

Wow, I’m gone for 5 days and this topic comes up.

AWDrifter, in your opinion what is a reasonable excuse to abort a fetus?

Also, is there an epidemic in later term abortion going on? It would seem to me that most people who have a late term abortino do it for health reasons and that those who get one earlier do it for personal reasons. The latter would seem to be far fewer.

My point wasn’t even about pro-life / pro-choice.
I wasn’t able to explain in earlier posts but I will try one more time.
My point is in the cases where there is a baby on the table(or w/e) that survived the abortion process.
Obama voted against protecting these babies.
Abortion is not the issue.
I am not trying to take away abortion rights, I just think a baby sitting on a table should be saved.
That seems crazy to just about every NYSPEEDER and that worries me.
That is all.

I am done with this topic because you will never understand what we are trying to show you. I am going to agree with others that there are more important issues on the table that are far more important at this moment

/aborting the topic of abortion

Oh yeah that’s right, a baby on a table can kill a woman.

see above response.

So we should only save 100% healthy babies?

Not surpised.

Great job showing me. Thanks.
Those quotes are a fine display of your intelligence.

dude are you serious?

The only reason the baby is on the table is because if it was in mommy the full 9 months, mommy would have died, taking baby with it. The baby on the table is underdeveloped and if they made an attempt to keep it alive, it would most definitely not work, and if for some fucking strange alienated reason it did, it would be mutated looking and underdeveloped, have all sorts of problems, and die within the first few years of its life anyways.

You make it seem like they use this procedure 1 week before due date for no reason other than the mother changed her mind. Not the case, whatsoever.

^Sorry I didn’t relaize you were a doctor.

What did I say to make it seem like they use this procedure 1 week before the due date?

you make it sound like a woman carries a baby to term, has it, and then Obama executes it on the table in the delivery room with a hatchet.

Ok, what did I say specifically?

It would be a good start to actually be able to read.

wow, all this talk about baby killing and no one has mentioned anything about a democrat and former VP nominee on the stage at the RNC praising the republican nominee.

+1. But he’s not Democrat anymore, he’s an Independent.

Still pretty huge that a guy who 8 years ago was the Democratic VP nominee is at the RNC saying vote McCain/Palin. :bowrofl:

I cant be the only one that laughed hysterically when they read that.

^I did.

:bowrofl:

I am glad you have the comprehension of a new born baby and your ability to recognize sarcasm is just outstanding

I thought you were done with this topic.
Go away noob.

that amazing considering Clinton did not have a domestic policy his enitre 8 years in office.

True.

The only real difference there should be in voting between republican and democrat (assuming the impossible that the candidates would actually follow their parties real principles) is which philosophy of government you believe better works.

Free-market conservatism or Socialist liberalism.

I personally consider my self conservative, but only financially. I am socially liberal.

Wow, that is a clusterfuck isn’t it?

I believe that completely free markets with very little but some regulation are better in the long run than manipulated markets with a lot of regulation.

I am not blind either, I can see why there are people on the other side of the argument, I just believe my side is the better, safer option.

My belief is that the solution to our biggest problem is to cut spending by over 50% and raise taxes to where the were before the Bush tax cuts until the national debt is under control. After that taxes can be lowered to a lower level, related directly to shrinking of the federal government. I would rather see he money in smaller local governments whether it be state, county or town because it is almost always used more efficiently and fairly that way.

It is also a hell of a lot easier to send a letter to your town mayor and complain about misused public funds than it is to send letters to congress about the same issue. Keep taxes as local as possible.

SHE JUST SPANKED BARRY!

I was LMAO!

^^^ I some what agree about the tax issues with Penfold

Why do republicans think this country is run by magical wizards who can conjure up some gold and pay for things? Is it that hard to take in that taxes are needed so we do not have to borrow some ungodly amount of money from china ???