intel sucks balls, but u knew that already matt 
[quote=“Marcus,post:19,topic:33794"”]
Suck a dick…AMD is the ONLY manufactures with TRU*E 4 cores on a single die…do some homework before you open your mouth…
http://multicore.amd.com/us-en/quadcore/
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2939
[/quote]
First off, I never said they didn’t have 4 cores on one die so try READING some. I know it’s hard when your head is wedged so far up your own ass, sunglasses optional.
You are really an idiot. TRUE 4 cores doesn’t mean shit when your processor is slow.
SHOW ME BENCHMARKS, MARCUS OR STFU!!
Just because you worked at localnet or wherever the fuck it was, doesn’t mean you know what you are talking about…
[quote=“BuickGN,post:21,topic:33794"”]
intel sucks balls, but u knew that already matt 
[/quote]
That’s why they are the fastest processor out there and one generation of process technology ahead of AMD…
[quote=“RuBiCaNT,post:22,topic:33794"”]
First off, I never said they didn’t have 4 cores on one die so try READING some. I know it’s hard when your head is wedged so far up your own ass, sunglasses optional.
[/quote]
I actually jsut snorted when i laughed there…
[quote=“RuBiCaNT,post:22,topic:33794"”]
TRUE 4 cores doesn’t mean shit when your processor is slow.
[/quote]
This is the most retarted statement ever coming out of your cavity infested mouth
Just because you worked at localnet or wherever the fuck it was, doesn’t mean you know what you are talking about…[/quote]
ISP Support and speaking of processors…hmmmm, yes I would say that makes sense…your a true borm fucking idiot. Your father should have pulled out.
[quote=“RuBiCaNT,post:22,topic:33794"”]
TRUE 4 cores doesn’t mean shit when your processor is slow.
[/quote]
fuck… i have to agree with marcus on this one… define slow
[quote=“ILCisDEAD,post:26,topic:33794"”]
fuck… i have to agree with marcus on this one… define slow
[/quote]
Intel droped their internal clock speed SIGNIFICANTLY in the core 2 duo processor so where is your logic here dickhead?
:walter:
Where’s RX3’s bench racnig sucks pic? Can’t seem to find it.
[quote=“Marcus,post:25,topic:33794"”]
retarted…your a true borm fucking idiot
[/quote]
<3 irony.
[quote=“Marcus,post:27,topic:33794"”]
Intel droped their internal clock speed SIGNIFICANTLY in the core 2 duo processor so where is your logic here dickhead?
[/quote]
I AM AGREEING WITH YOU… I WOULD LIKE HIM TO DEFINE SLOW IN HIS STATMENT… WHERE IS YOUR COMPREHENSION??? PUT YOUR GLASSES BACK ON BECAUSE YOUR MONITOR IS OBVIOUSLY TOO BRIGHT… OR GO PARK OUTSIDE OF SKYBAR AND SEE WHAT DUDES WILL LIKE YOUR NIPPLES YOU SHIRTLESS FUCK
[quote=“ILCisDEAD,post:29,topic:33794"”]
I AM AGREEING WITH YOU… I WOULD LIKE HIM TO DEFINE SLOW IN HIS STATMENT… WHERE IS YOUR COMPREHENSION??? PUT YOUR GLASSES BACK ON BECAUSE YOUR MONITOR IS OBVIOUSLY TOO BRIGHT… OR GO PARK OUTSIDE OF SKYBAR AND SEE WHAT DUDES WILL LIKE YOUR NIPPLES YOU SHIRTLESS FUCK
[/quote]
I know dipstick…that was aimed at rub-I-Cant…i just quoted what you stated.
[quote=“Marcus,post:30,topic:33794"”]
I know dipstick…that was aimed at rub-I-Cunt…i just quoted what you stated.
[/quote]
THEN WHY DID YOU QUOTE ME!!! QUOTING GENERALLY MEANS TALKING TO
[quote=“RuBiCaNT,post:23,topic:33794"”]
That’s why they are the fastest processor out there and one generation of process technology ahead of AMD…
[/quote]
i was just referring my hatred towards intel is all
which u should know lol
http://www.overclockers.com/tips01164/
SLOW is defined as being NOT AS FAST as Intel’s…
Here is what Intel has at around the same time that Barcelona (That’s the codename for the Quad Core AMD, Marcus)…
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/hwdb.php?tid=837360&tp=Intel-Penryn-Preview&rid=837360
[quote=“ILCisDEAD,post:31,topic:33794"”]
THEN WHY DID YOU QUOTE ME!!! QUOTING GENERALLY MEANS TALKING TO
[/quote]
I know…Im still waking up…
dont be mad…I will buy you some new shorts come friday…
Plaid shorts PLEASE!!! And do i have to change infront of you?
[quote=“Marcus,post:27,topic:33794"”]
Intel droped their internal clock speed SIGNIFICANTLY in the core 2 duo processor so where is your logic here dickhead?
[/quote]
You just told me in saying that, that you don’t have a fucking clue what you are talking about.
Please explain how they “dropped their internal clock speed significantly”?
I’d like to see your facts and reference for this statement.
[quote=“RuBiCaNT,post:33,topic:33794"”]
http://www.overclockers.com/tips01164/
SLOW is defined as being NOT AS FAST as Intel’s…
[/quote]
Dude…are you serious??
Here is what Intel has at around the same time that Barcelona (That’s the codename for the Quad Core AMD, Marcus)…
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/hwdb.php?tid=837360&tp=Intel-Penryn-Preview&rid=837360
The AMD Quad Cores are suppose to theoretically out perform the Xeon processor line…wait until it’s released later this year. Clock speed is irrelevant at this point. Multi-core processing it where technology is headed. Intel even had talks to produce a processor with 64 cores by 2009
well… when they were up to 3.8ghz i think was the highest i have seen… then most processors now sit anywhere from 2.0ghz to 2.6ghz… I would say thats a drop. I think this is what marcus was getting at… but again its a terrible way to grade a processor when the L2 and L1 caches have increased immensely in size… and obviously the introduction of mulitple processing cores to increase performance.
[quote=“Marcus,post:37,topic:33794"”]
Multi-core processing it where technology is headed.
[/quote]
man you are way behind in the times… this was known like 3 years ago
[quote=“ILCisDEAD,post:39,topic:33794"”]
man you are way behind in the times… this was known like 3 years ago
[/quote]
LOL…you guy crack me up…:zong: I know thats where technology has been for the last several years…but Intel and AMD is focuses on core processing now…you will see 4 cores, 8 cores, 16 core…that is the road ahead for future processors to come. :gay3: